* script-representative-chars for emoji
@ 2021-10-04 14:55 Robert Pluim
2021-10-04 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Pluim @ 2021-10-04 14:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-devel
Hi,
I added the following
(emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F)))
to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but Iʼm
now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that
can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. Iʼve not
noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it
in emacs-28?
Thanks
Robert
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: script-representative-chars for emoji
2021-10-04 14:55 script-representative-chars for emoji Robert Pluim
@ 2021-10-04 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-10-04 16:55 ` Robert Pluim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2021-10-04 16:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:55:38 +0200
>
> Hi,
>
> I added the following
>
> (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F)))
>
> to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but Iʼm
> now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that
> can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. Iʼve not
> noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it
> in emacs-28?
Didn't we add VS-16 to have sequences that begin with non-Emoji
character and end in VS-16 displayed in Emoji font, the change you did
in font_ranges? If you remove it, what happens to the likes of U+25AB
followed by U+FE0F ?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: script-representative-chars for emoji
2021-10-04 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2021-10-04 16:55 ` Robert Pluim
2021-10-04 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Pluim @ 2021-10-04 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
>>>>> On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 19:37:56 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
>> Gmane-Reply-To-List: yes
>> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 16:55:38 +0200
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I added the following
>>
>> (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F)))
>>
>> to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but Iʼm
>> now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that
>> can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. Iʼve not
>> noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it
>> in emacs-28?
Eli> Didn't we add VS-16 to have sequences that begin with non-Emoji
Eli> character and end in VS-16 displayed in Emoji font, the change you did
Eli> in font_ranges? If you remove it, what happens to the likes of U+25AB
Eli> followed by U+FE0F ?
We added it to the emoji script, but that doesnʼt mean it needs to be
in script-representative-chars. U+25AB U+FE0F is still composed
correctly and displays with the colourful emoji glyph if I remove it
from there.
Robert
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: script-representative-chars for emoji
2021-10-04 16:55 ` Robert Pluim
@ 2021-10-04 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-10-04 17:12 ` Robert Pluim
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2021-10-04 17:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert Pluim; +Cc: emacs-devel
> From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 18:55:55 +0200
>
> >> I added the following
> >>
> >> (emoji #x1F300 #x1F600 #xFE0F)))
> >>
> >> to script-representative-chars when creating the emoji script, but Iʼm
> >> now wondering if that #xFE0F was a mistake, as there are fonts that
> >> can represent emoji that won't have a glyph for VS-16. Iʼve not
> >> noticed any negative effects so far, but perhaps we should remove it
> >> in emacs-28?
>
> Eli> Didn't we add VS-16 to have sequences that begin with non-Emoji
> Eli> character and end in VS-16 displayed in Emoji font, the change you did
> Eli> in font_ranges? If you remove it, what happens to the likes of U+25AB
> Eli> followed by U+FE0F ?
>
> We added it to the emoji script, but that doesnʼt mean it needs to be
> in script-representative-chars. U+25AB U+FE0F is still composed
> correctly and displays with the colourful emoji glyph if I remove it
> from there.
Then I'm okay with removing it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: script-representative-chars for emoji
2021-10-04 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2021-10-04 17:12 ` Robert Pluim
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Robert Pluim @ 2021-10-04 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: emacs-devel
>>>>> On Mon, 04 Oct 2021 20:07:15 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
>> We added it to the emoji script, but that doesnʼt mean it needs to be
>> in script-representative-chars. U+25AB U+FE0F is still composed
>> correctly and displays with the colourful emoji glyph if I remove it
>> from there.
Eli> Then I'm okay with removing it.
Done.
Robert
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-10-04 17:12 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-10-04 14:55 script-representative-chars for emoji Robert Pluim
2021-10-04 16:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-10-04 16:55 ` Robert Pluim
2021-10-04 17:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-10-04 17:12 ` Robert Pluim
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).