Re: Merging Org tests

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:10:30 +0100
> 
> I understand that it would be desirable to include the Org tests in Emacs.

Yes, I think so.

> The readme/file-organization file in the "test" dir of emacs.git is a bit
> confusing.  Why does it talk about an "automated" folder that isn't there?
> I guess it's simply "lisp" folder.

Yes, that was a left-over from the old organization.  I fixed the
text.

> Also, how strictly must the suggested file organization be followed?
> Skimming "make-test-deps.emacs-lisp" it seems it might have to be followed
> rather strictly.  In Org, tests are already organized into a different
> file hierarchy and use a slightly different naming scheme.

Is it a problem to change Org test files to follow the current
organization below test/?  IOW, put all the Org files in
test/lisp/org/?

> What would be the best strategy for including the Org tests in the Emacs
> repo?
> 
> 1. Include Org tests in the "manual" folder and keep the current structure.
> 2. Start to reorganize the tests in the Org repo to follow the Emacs
>    scheme.
> 3. Keep tests in the Org repo.

My preference is 2, if it's feasible.

Thanks.