From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging Org tests Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:20:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8337fg217c.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871sv0oljt.fsf@gmx.us> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1487089276 30284 195.159.176.226 (14 Feb 2017 16:21:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Rasmus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 14 17:21:12 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cdfqo-0007PH-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 17:21:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35703 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdfqu-0000su-JJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41680) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdfqK-0000YE-BU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:20:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdfqG-0003xs-LI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:20:39 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:49585) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cdfqG-0003xk-IH; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:20:36 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3104 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cdfqF-0005NX-TG; Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:20:36 -0500 In-reply-to: <871sv0oljt.fsf@gmx.us> (message from Rasmus on Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:10:30 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:212379 Archived-At: > From: Rasmus > Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:10:30 +0100 > > I understand that it would be desirable to include the Org tests in Emacs. Yes, I think so. > The readme/file-organization file in the "test" dir of emacs.git is a bit > confusing. Why does it talk about an "automated" folder that isn't there? > I guess it's simply "lisp" folder. Yes, that was a left-over from the old organization. I fixed the text. > Also, how strictly must the suggested file organization be followed? > Skimming "make-test-deps.emacs-lisp" it seems it might have to be followed > rather strictly. In Org, tests are already organized into a different > file hierarchy and use a slightly different naming scheme. Is it a problem to change Org test files to follow the current organization below test/? IOW, put all the Org files in test/lisp/org/? > What would be the best strategy for including the Org tests in the Emacs > repo? > > 1. Include Org tests in the "manual" folder and keep the current structure. > 2. Start to reorganize the tests in the Org repo to follow the Emacs > scheme. > 3. Keep tests in the Org repo. My preference is 2, if it's feasible. Thanks.