Re: Proposal: ls-lisp.el handle --group-directories-first flag

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>]

> From: Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 21:02:56 +0200
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:
> 
> >> From: Arthur Miller <arthur.miller@live.com>
> >> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> >> Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2021 16:58:08 +0200
> >> 
> >> >> > Btw, in my testing, with ls-lisp-dirs-first bound non-nil, the
> >> >> > directories are shown in their correct alphabetically sorted order.
> >> >> > So I'm unsure what problems you saw and in which scenario.  Can you
> >> >> > tell more about this issue?
> >> 
> >> When I was testing, if ls-lisp-dirs-first is nil, and
> >> --group-directories-first is specified, dirs come out in reverse order
> >> in new buffer. Just reverting the buffer didn't show this. I don't know
> >> why it is so.
> >
> > Because --group-directories-first includes 'r'?
> No, it is removed from switches before sorting happends, in this patch.
> 
> >> If you are OK with the patch2, then here is one without -U on top of
> >> that one.
> >
> > I take it that the problem with the reverse order doesn't exist?  Or
> > does it still exist and needs to be debugged?
> 
> No longer, the last patch fixes it by setting let-bound value of
> ls-lisp-dirs-first to 't. I hope somebody else test it too,
> beside me.

Thanks, I installed it, with some minimal changes.

Btw, I don't see a copyright assignment for your contributions on
file.  Would you like to start the legal paperwork rolling, so we
could accept further contributions from you in the future?