unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm)
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu>, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4...
Date: 06 Nov 2002 13:40:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5xbs52oor1.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.1021106082925.960E-100000@is>

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:

> Feature freeze means there are _no_ new features until the thaw; Kai 
> suggested a finer control (allow some new features, but not others).

IMO, a feature freeze on the trunk at the current state would be OK!

There are now so many new features and fixes compared to 21.[1-3], that
starting a pretest cycle for 21.4 from the trunk would be a _good thing_
to start getting all those new features tested (before we add even more
features).

Admittedly, it would halt "development" on the trunk for, say 2-3
months, but what's the purpose of such developments anyway if we
(virtually) never make a release containing those new features?

So I suggest that we announce a date (e.g. Dec 1st) for a trunk
feature freeze and make the first pretest for 21.4 soon thereafter,
with the goal of releasing 21.4 no later than Mar 1st, 2003!

In my experience, the trunk has been very stable for a very long time
[with a few hickups of course], so after the first few pretests, I
would assume that the software would be stable enough for a release,
or at least stable enough that we could make a 21_4 release branch for
ironing out the final issues with the 21.4 release and remove the
feature freeze on the trunk before Mar 1st (or whenever 21.4 will
actually be ready).

Are anyone of you aware of any significant stability (or redisplay)
related bugs that we need to fix before 21.4 ?

Are there any of the on-going tasks which *must be* completed before
we release 21.4 ?

I know we need some work on the manuals for the new features; maybe
the goal of releasing 21.4 soon will also move our focus towards
writing proper documentation for the new features (I know I still have
a few pending tasks in that area).

WDYT ??

-- 
Kim F. Storm <storm@cua.dk> http://www.cua.dk

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-06 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-11-04 16:16 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4 Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-04 18:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-11-05  6:05   ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05  7:02     ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-11-05  8:02       ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-05 18:40       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05 20:44         ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-11-06  6:29           ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-06  6:58             ` Karl Eichwalder
2002-11-06 14:18               ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-08 10:32                 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-07 15:07               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05  8:02     ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-05 18:56       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05 12:02     ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-05 19:00       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05 20:50         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-11-06  6:33           ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-06 12:40             ` Kim F. Storm [this message]
2002-11-06 12:55               ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-06 14:25               ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-06 14:49                 ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-06 14:51                 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-07 22:02                 ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-07  8:08               ` (no subject) Kenichi Handa
2002-11-08 12:06                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 22:00               ` 21.2.90 pretest, 21.3, 21.4 Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-09 11:54                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-06  7:28         ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-06 14:19           ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-06  7:49         ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-05 18:39     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-11-05 19:17       ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05 20:37         ` Stefan Monnier
2002-11-06  6:00           ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05  5:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05  7:56   ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-05 18:54     ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-05 20:40       ` Juanma Barranquero
2002-11-06  6:13         ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-06  4:49 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-06  8:25   ` Juanma Barranquero
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-11-06 15:58 jasonr

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5xbs52oor1.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk \
    --to=storm@cua.dk \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).