From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Simple way to make conditional key bindings.
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 18:36:28 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208260036.g7Q0aSR12388@wijiji.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5x4rdlbx1i.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk)
(global-set-key [f11]
'(cond
(a delete-char)
(b find-file)
(c nil)
(t (keymap (?a . "abc") (?b . "bcd")))))
I agree that this is convenient. The question is, is it better to
make this a primitive facility, as you suggested, or to add a macro to
do the job using menu-item, as Stefan suggested?
Using menu-item has an advantage that we use a function rather than
a form. It also has the advantage of not adding any complexity
to the key binding data structures.
But those are not the only factors; others may be more important.
One advantage (IMO) is that C-h k C-y will report yank or
yank-with-properties depending on the actual function taken if
you hit C-y.
If we use menu-item, what will C-h c say?
One problem with your change is "what binding do we use when we don't want
to run code?". The `menu-item' syntax provides a binding (in the example
above it's "my-filter" which is not very useful indeed) for the case
where code should not be evalled (for example in `where-is').
I think we do want where-is to find this binding, though.
(define-key global-map "\C-y" 'yank-careful)
(defun yank-careful (...)
"Reinsert the last stretch of killed text, like `yank'.
Contrary to `yank' this function is careful to preserve some important
text properties when yanking tables."
...)
The advantage is that C-h k C-y doesn't just give you one of the two
bindings but a docstring that describes both.
I think that sometimes this will be better, but sometimes it will be
better for C-h k to give the doc string for the specific command
that will be executed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-26 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-23 12:05 Suggestion: Simple way to make conditional key bindings Kim F. Storm
2002-08-26 0:36 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-08-26 16:21 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-30 10:27 ` Robert J. Chassell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-08-23 12:52 David PONCE
[not found] <3D49FF140074EFAE@mel-rta7.wanadoo.fr>
2002-08-23 13:16 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-08-23 17:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-25 23:33 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-08-26 15:47 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-26 19:33 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-27 19:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-27 22:58 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-08-28 23:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-29 8:54 ` Kim F. Storm
2002-08-28 1:00 ` Miles Bader
2002-08-28 1:22 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-27 11:23 ` Kim F. Storm
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208260036.g7Q0aSR12388@wijiji.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).