From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower?
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:30:53 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200206171630.g5HGUr413822@aztec.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ap3bsabgjc1.fsf@z.glue.umd.edu> (deego@glue.umd.edu)
> emacs (both 21.1 and 21.2.90, and others) does get really slow
> when (length load-history) touches 290--300ish.. which frustrates me,
> but i guess that can't be helped.. (?)..)
>
> Which operations get slow? Who knows whether this can be helped,
> until we investigate it.
I shall look into profiling etc. and get back to this list with
precise statistics re: speed vs. (lengh load-history).
I see I did not choose my words clearly. I am sorry.
The first question is, which *user-level* operations get slow in this
situation? That you should know from simple observation.
Looking at the code in one of those user-level operations might lead
you pretty directly to the primitive that gets slow.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-17 16:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-14 20:32 Is it just me, or did 21.3.50 get a whole lot slower? John Wiegley
2002-06-14 20:55 ` D. Goel
2002-06-15 21:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-06-16 18:38 ` D. Goel
2002-06-17 16:30 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-06-18 16:36 ` D. Goel
2002-06-19 5:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-06-19 6:01 ` John Wiegley
2002-06-19 6:23 ` D. Goel
2002-06-20 14:33 ` Richard Stallman
2002-06-15 17:19 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-06-15 21:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-19 0:36 ` John Wiegley
2002-12-31 5:48 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-31 6:12 ` John Wiegley
2003-01-02 18:38 ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-03 5:50 ` John Wiegley
2003-01-03 20:30 ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-04 4:12 ` John Wiegley
2003-01-04 23:54 ` Kim F. Storm
2003-01-05 18:33 ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-14 14:40 ` Phillip Lord
2003-01-14 20:12 ` John Wiegley
2003-01-15 11:05 ` Richard Stallman
2003-01-15 11:56 ` Phillip Lord
2003-01-17 9:22 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-01 5:21 ` Looks like I found the slowdown John Wiegley
2002-11-02 3:32 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200206171630.g5HGUr413822@aztec.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).