bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Sam Steingold]

It is not nice to have to do M-x rcirc whenever the connection dies.
Would it be possible to incorporate something similar to
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/rcircReconnect
Please?

In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0, NS apple-appkit-1265.19)
 of 2014-03-18 on sds-MacBook-Pro.local
Windowing system distributor `Apple', version 10.3.1265
Configured using:
 `configure --with-ns'

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1265
http://www.childpsy.net/ https://www.facebook.com/TheIslamicThreat
http://camera.org http://americancensorship.org http://ffii.org
Yellow wine is called "white" because it is made out of green grapes.

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Leo Liu]

On 2014-03-20 10:33 +0800, Sam Steingold wrote:
> It is not nice to have to do M-x rcirc whenever the connection dies.
> Would it be possible to incorporate something similar to
> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/rcircReconnect
> Please?
>
> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0, NS apple-appkit-1265.19)
>  of 2014-03-18 on sds-MacBook-Pro.local
> Windowing system distributor `Apple', version 10.3.1265
> Configured using:
>  `configure --with-ns'

Hi Sam,

Would something like this suit your needs? Thanks for testing. - Leo

=== modified file 'lisp/net/rcirc.el'
--- lisp/net/rcirc.el	2014-04-08 03:32:37 +0000
+++ lisp/net/rcirc.el	2014-04-08 08:27:11 +0000
@@ -521,6 +521,7 @@
 (defvar rcirc-user-authenticated nil)
 (defvar rcirc-user-disconnect nil)
 (defvar rcirc-connecting nil)
+(defvar rcirc-connection-info nil)
 (defvar rcirc-process nil)
 
 ;;;###autoload
@@ -549,22 +550,23 @@
       (set-process-sentinel process 'rcirc-sentinel)
       (set-process-filter process 'rcirc-filter)
 
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-process) process)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-server) server)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-server-name) server) ; Update when we get 001 response.
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-buffer-alist) nil)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-nick-table)
-           (make-hash-table :test 'equal))
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-nick) nick)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-process-output) nil)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-startup-channels) startup-channels)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-last-server-message-time)
-           (current-time))
-
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-timeout-timer) nil)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-user-disconnect) nil)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-user-authenticated) nil)
-      (set (make-local-variable 'rcirc-connecting) t)
+      (setq-local rcirc-connection-info
+		  (list server port nick user-name full-name startup-channels
+			password encryption))
+      (setq-local rcirc-process process)
+      (setq-local rcirc-server server)
+      (setq-local rcirc-server-name server) ; Update when we get 001 response.
+      (setq-local rcirc-buffer-alist nil)
+      (setq-local rcirc-nick-table (make-hash-table :test 'equal))
+      (setq-local rcirc-nick nick)
+      (setq-local rcirc-process-output nil)
+      (setq-local rcirc-startup-channels startup-channels)
+      (setq-local rcirc-last-server-message-time (current-time))
+
+      (setq-local rcirc-timeout-timer nil)
+      (setq-local rcirc-user-disconnect nil)
+      (setq-local rcirc-user-authenticated nil)
+      (setq-local rcirc-connecting t)
 
       (add-hook 'auto-save-hook 'rcirc-log-write)
 
@@ -782,11 +784,11 @@
 (defun rcirc-buffer-process (&optional buffer)
   "Return the process associated with channel BUFFER.
 With no argument or nil as argument, use the current buffer."
-  (or (get-buffer-process (if buffer
-			      (with-current-buffer buffer
-				rcirc-server-buffer)
-			    rcirc-server-buffer))
-      rcirc-process))
+  (let ((buffer (or buffer (if (buffer-live-p rcirc-server-buffer)
+			       rcirc-server-buffer
+			     (error "Server buffer deleted")))))
+    (or (with-current-buffer buffer rcirc-process)
+	rcirc-process)))
 
 (defun rcirc-server-name (process)
   "Return PROCESS server name, given by the 001 response."
@@ -2210,6 +2212,17 @@
 					 reason
 				       rcirc-id-string))))
 
+(defun-rcirc-command reconnect (_)
+  "Reconnect to current server."
+  (interactive "i")
+  (with-rcirc-server-buffer
+    (unless (or rcirc-connecting (process-live-p process))
+      (let ((conn-info (copy-sequence rcirc-connection-info)))
+	(setf (nth 5 conn-info)
+	      (cl-remove-if-not #'rcirc-channel-p
+				(mapcar #'car rcirc-buffer-alist)))
+	(apply #'rcirc-connect conn-info)))))
+
 (defun-rcirc-command nick (nick)
   "Change nick to NICK."
   (interactive "i")

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Daimrod]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 863 bytes --]

Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2014-03-20 10:33 +0800, Sam Steingold wrote:
>> It is not nice to have to do M-x rcirc whenever the connection dies.
>> Would it be possible to incorporate something similar to
>> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/rcircReconnect
>> Please?
>>
>> In GNU Emacs 24.3.50.1 (x86_64-apple-darwin13.1.0, NS apple-appkit-1265.19)
>>  of 2014-03-18 on sds-MacBook-Pro.local
>> Windowing system distributor `Apple', version 10.3.1265
>> Configured using:
>>  `configure --with-ns'
>
> Hi Sam,
>
> Would something like this suit your needs? Thanks for testing. - Leo

It would be nice if a hook was run with the old and the new process as
arguments.

For example, shoes-off[1] would need it to update the process plist and
its inner structures.

1: https://github.com/nicferrier/shoes-off

-- 
Daimrod/Greg

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Leo Liu]

On 2014-04-08 17:33 +0800, Daimrod wrote:
> It would be nice if a hook was run with the old and the new process as
> arguments.
>
> For example, shoes-off[1] would need it to update the process plist and
> its inner structures.
>
> 1: https://github.com/nicferrier/shoes-off

Please give more details about what it does and the requirements to
support it. I probably won't have time to try 3rd party code.

Thanks,
Leo

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Daimrod]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1379 bytes --]

Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2014-04-08 17:33 +0800, Daimrod wrote:
>> It would be nice if a hook was run with the old and the new process as
>> arguments.
>>
>> For example, shoes-off[1] would need it to update the process plist and
>> its inner structures.
>>
>> 1: https://github.com/nicferrier/shoes-off
>
> Please give more details about what it does and the requirements to
> support it. I probably won't have time to try 3rd party code.

Shoes-off is an IRC bouncer built on top of RCIRC. So basically, it uses
RCIRC to connect to IRC servers and listen on a specific port for
clients. When a clients connect, it is as if it was connected to the IRC
servers. To do that, shoes-off "binds" RCIRC processes to a client
connection and it uses process-plist to store this kind of information.

However, when a RCIRC connection is restarted, AFAIK it just means that
a new connection is established. So, from shoes-off's POV, the previous
RCIRC process is dead, hence it can not continue to forward the messages
between the RCIRC connection and the client.

That's why I would like a way to be notified when a RCIRC process is
replaced so that shoes-off can update the connections information. But
to do that, I would probably need more that just a notification, I would
need the old and the new process.

Best,

-- 
Daimrod/Greg

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Sam Steingold]

> * Daimrod <qnvzebq@tznvy.pbz> [2014-04-08 23:03:45 +0900]:
>
> That's why I would like a way to be notified when a RCIRC process is
> replaced so that shoes-off can update the connections information.

would rcirc-reconnect-hook be enough?

> But to do that, I would probably need more that just a notification, I
> would need the old and the new process.

I am afraid the old process is dead and discarded by this time.

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1265
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://palestinefacts.org
http://islamexposedonline.com http://truepeace.org http://dhimmi.com
Murphy's Law was probably named after the wrong guy.

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Sam Steingold]

Hi Leo,

> * Leo Liu <fqy.jro@tznvy.pbz> [2014-04-08 16:33:18 +0800]:
>
> Would something like this suit your needs? Thanks for testing. - Leo

looks good, except that you might want to avoid mixing functional
changes with cosmetic ones (setq-local & rcirc-buffer-process).

thanks!

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1265
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://honestreporting.com http://palestinefacts.org
http://memri.org https://www.facebook.com/TheIslamicThreat http://truepeace.org
If Microsoft wrote poetry, it would have patented dactyl and anapest.

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Daimrod]

Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org> writes:

>> * Daimrod <qnvzebq@tznvy.pbz> [2014-04-08 23:03:45 +0900]:
>>
>> That's why I would like a way to be notified when a RCIRC process is
>> replaced so that shoes-off can update the connections information.
>
> would rcirc-reconnect-hook be enough?
>
>> But to do that, I would probably need more that just a notification, I
>> would need the old and the new process.
>
> I am afraid the old process is dead and discarded by this time.

Hmm, does the new process use the same buffer or does it create a new
one?

I'm trying to find a way to identify which RCIRC process is replaced.
Simply checking which connection is dead is probably not enough in case
more than one conections dropped at the same time.

-- 
Daimrod/Greg

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Leo Liu]

On 2014-04-10 08:47 +0800, Daimrod wrote:
> Hmm, does the new process use the same buffer or does it create a new
> one?
>
> I'm trying to find a way to identify which RCIRC process is replaced.
> Simply checking which connection is dead is probably not enough in case
> more than one conections dropped at the same time.

When users kick off /reconnect it will find the connection info in the
server buffer and fire off rcirc-connect which will reuse the buffer if
I am not mistaken.

Leo

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Daimrod]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 605 bytes --]

Leo Liu <sdl.web@gmail.com> writes:

> On 2014-04-10 08:47 +0800, Daimrod wrote:
>> Hmm, does the new process use the same buffer or does it create a new
>> one?
>>
>> I'm trying to find a way to identify which RCIRC process is replaced.
>> Simply checking which connection is dead is probably not enough in case
>> more than one conections dropped at the same time.
>
> When users kick off /reconnect it will find the connection info in the
> server buffer and fire off rcirc-connect which will reuse the buffer if
> I am not mistaken.

Ok, then it's doable.

Best,

-- 
Daimrod/Greg

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 835 bytes --]

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Sam Steingold]

Hi Leo,

> * Leo Liu <fqy.jro@tznvy.pbz> [2014-04-08 16:33:18 +0800]:
>
> On 2014-03-20 10:33 +0800, Sam Steingold wrote:
>> It is not nice to have to do M-x rcirc whenever the connection dies.
>> Would it be possible to incorporate something similar to
>> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/rcircReconnect
>
> Would something like this suit your needs? Thanks for testing. - Leo

This indeed enables me to auto-reconnect like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(defvar sds-rcirc-sentinel-last (current-time) "last reconnect attempt time")
(defun sds-rcirc-sentinel (process sentinel)
  (let* ((now (current-time))
         (delay (float-time (time-subtract (current-time)
                                           sds-rcirc-sentinel-last))))
    (message "%s sds-rcirc-sentinel: %s %s %s (last: %s, %s ago)"
             (format-time-string "%F %R") process
             (process-status process) sentinel
             (format-time-string "%F %R" sds-rcirc-sentinel-last)
             (sds-difftime-to-string delay))
    (when (and (string= sentinel "deleted")
               (< 60 delay)) ; do not try to reconnect more than once a minute
      (setq sds-rcirc-sentinel-last now)
      (rcirc-cmd-reconnect nil))))
(add-hook 'rcirc-sentinel-functions 'sds-rcirc-sentinel)
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

However, I would much prefer to enable auto-reconnect by a simple

(custom-set-variables '(rcirc-reconnect-interval 60))

where rcirc-reconnect-interval = 0 means the current behavior (no
auto-reconnect).

Do you mind if I commit something based on the above or would you like
to implement it yourself?

Thanks a lot for your help!

-- 
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1265
http://www.childpsy.net/ http://think-israel.org http://mideasttruth.com
http://pmw.org.il http://honestreporting.com
There is an exception to every rule, including this one.

bug#17045: 24.3.50; feature request: rcirc-reconnect

[Leo Liu]

On 2014-05-07 13:57 -0400, Sam Steingold wrote:
> Do you mind if I commit something based on the above?

Not at all. Please make the change and thanks ;)

Leo