unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eshel Yaron via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 63988@debbugs.gnu.org, aaronjensen@gmail.com,
	Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: bug#63988: 30.0.50; Recent header line format changes cause spin/seg fault with format-mode-line
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 12:07:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1o7lnado5.fsf@eshelyaron.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83wn0bzoeb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 10 Jun 2023 11:56:28 +0300")

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Cc: 63988@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2023 09:47:29 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> 
>> > From: Aaron Jensen <aaronjensen@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 21:09:45 -0400
>> > 
>> > 
>> > (setq header-line-format '(:eval (format-mode-line "")))
>> > 
>> > This causes Emacs to spin as of commit:
>> > 4f66cbbfe520ee31ef26676e09a926217d9736fe
>> > 
>> > After some time, it will segfault.
>> 
>> It causes infinite recursion, since format-mode-line also calls
>> window_wants_header_line (indirectly).
>> 
>> But what is the purpose of such a strange (to use a civilized word)
>> setting of header-line-format?  Why do you need :eval at all in this
>> case?
>> 
>> IOW, why not say "don't do that" and be done?
>
> For now, I installed a semi-kludgey fix.
>
> However, I wonder whether we should rethink this minor feature.
> Perhaps this minor convenience is not worth the complications?
> window_wants_header_line is called in many places, all of which can
> now evaluate arbitrary Lisp, and all of which can now GC.  I've
> audited the various callers, and didn't see anything obvious that
> could cause problems with calling Lisp or GC in those places, but I
> could have missed something.
>
> This is actually a general issue with Emacs: we keep piling one minor
> feature upon another, and don't always reflect on the hard-to-maintain
> monster that creates.  We have already a couple of areas in the code
> base where we are afraid of making changes, because we don't have a
> good understanding of the complicated state variables there.  Maybe we
> should reject such minor features instead of keeping doing what we
> have been doing?
>
> So maybe we should declare this feature a failed experiment and remove
> it?

FWIW I think that make sense, but IMO it'd be best to only remove the
treatment of `:eval` in `window_wants_header_line`, and keep the new
treatment of `header-line-format` being a cons cell with a void or
nil-valued variable car.  That's still useful because it works well with
minor mode variables, and it's less risky as it doesn't involve
evaluating arbitrary lisp, just inspecting a variable.






  reply	other threads:[~2023-06-10  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-10  1:09 bug#63988: 30.0.50; Recent header line format changes cause spin/seg fault with format-mode-line Aaron Jensen
2023-06-10  6:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10  8:56   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10  9:07     ` Eshel Yaron via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors [this message]
2023-06-15  5:59       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-16  2:30         ` Aaron Jensen
2023-06-23 10:53         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-07-05 15:30         ` Spencer Baugh
2023-07-05 15:40           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 16:16     ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-06-10 17:42       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 17:51         ` Aaron Jensen
2023-06-10 19:11         ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2023-06-10 11:08   ` Aaron Jensen
2023-06-10 11:22     ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 11:59       ` Aaron Jensen
2023-06-10 13:04         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-10 15:06           ` Aaron Jensen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m1o7lnado5.fsf@eshelyaron.com \
    --to=bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    --cc=63988@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=aaronjensen@gmail.com \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=me@eshelyaron.com \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).