unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#2089: rmail summary never marks unseen messages
@ 2009-01-27 23:30 ` Glenn Morris
  2009-01-28  3:00   ` bug#2089: marked as done (rmail summary never marks unseen messages) Emacs bug Tracking System
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2009-01-27 23:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bug-gnu-emacs

Package: emacs,rmail

Visit an rmail folder with unseen messages. View the summary.
Unseen messages should be marked with a "-" in column 6, but are not.

AFAICS, it seems that in rmail-create-summary-line,
rmail-message-unseen-p never returns non-nil. It seems (?) that
rmail-message-attr-p's assumption that the Rmail buffer is unswapped
is invalid in this case, because the search limit it constructs is
bogus, so it never finds the attribute header.







^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* bug#2089: marked as done (rmail summary never marks unseen messages)
  2009-01-27 23:30 ` bug#2089: rmail summary never marks unseen messages Glenn Morris
@ 2009-01-28  3:00   ` Emacs bug Tracking System
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-01-28  3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Glenn Morris

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 884 bytes --]


Your message dated Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:50:36 -0500
with message-id <wc3af4jg8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#2089: rmail summary never marks unseen messages
has caused the Emacs bug report #2089,
regarding rmail summary never marks unseen messages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
2089: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=2089
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com with problems

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2575 bytes --]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: rmail summary never marks unseen messages
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:30:19 -0500
Message-ID: <1r62os4xg.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>

Package: emacs,rmail

Visit an rmail folder with unseen messages. View the summary.
Unseen messages should be marked with a "-" in column 6, but are not.

AFAICS, it seems that in rmail-create-summary-line,
rmail-message-unseen-p never returns non-nil. It seems (?) that
rmail-message-attr-p's assumption that the Rmail buffer is unswapped
is invalid in this case, because the search limit it constructs is
bogus, so it never finds the attribute header.




[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1526 bytes --]

From: Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org>
To: 2089-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: Re: bug#2089: rmail summary never marks unseen messages
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:50:36 -0500
Message-ID: <wc3af4jg8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>


2009-01-28  Glenn Morris  <rgm@gnu.org>

  * mail/rmailsum.el (rmail-create-summary-line): Fix unseen handling.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2009-01-28  3:00 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <wc3af4jg8z.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
2009-01-27 23:30 ` bug#2089: rmail summary never marks unseen messages Glenn Morris
2009-01-28  3:00   ` bug#2089: marked as done (rmail summary never marks unseen messages) Emacs bug Tracking System

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).