bug#66152: 30.0.50; Missing indent rules in c-ts-mode

[Yuan Fu <casouri@gmail.com>]

On 10/5/23 12:16 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Ping!  Yuan, I would really like to use the first patch in Emacs 29.2,
> if it looks OK to you.
>
>> Cc: 66152@debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 10:17:29 +0300
>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>
>>> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 14:29:07 +0200
>>> From: Augustin Chéneau (BTuin) <btuin@mailo.com>
>>>
>>> I found some more issues.
>>>
>>> First, there is no rule for an element in an else clause:
>>>
>>>
>>> if (true)
>>>     do_something();
>>> else
>>> do_something_else();
>>>
>>>
>>> "do_something_else" is not indented.
>>>
>>> There is also something weird with the bsd indent style.  It indents
>>> do_something and do_something_else to parent-bol with 0 offset, so the
>>> result is:
>>>
>>> if (true)
>>> do_something();
>>> else
>>> do_something_else();
>>>
>>>
>>> It is very different from the bsd style from c-mode, which produces this:
>>>
>>> if (true)
>>> 	do_something();
>>> else
>>> 	do_something_else();
>>>
>>> By looking at random files from OpenBSD, they do indent their
>>> expressions inside if and else:
>>>
>>> <https://cvsweb.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/~checkout~/src/sys/net/bsd-comp.c?rev=1.17&content-type=text/plain>
>>> (lines 277, 484, and 527)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Also there is a second patch which tries to handle specific types of
>>> comments.  I don't know how popular it is, but some people use these
>>> kind of comments:
>>>
>>> /*---------.
>>> | %param.  |
>>> `---------*/
>>>
>>> Here we want the vertical bar ("|") to be indented at the same column as
>>> the first "/".
>>>
>>> Currently the result is this:
>>>
>>> /*---------.
>>>     | %param.  |
>>>     `---------*/
>>>
>>> This patch is a just proof of concept.  If this new behavior is indeed
>>> wanted, I would clean it up and adapt other modes.
>> Yuan, any comments?  If the first patch looks good to you, I'd like to
>> install it on the release branch.
LGTM, I applied the first patch to emacs-29.

Yuan