From: Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org>
To: Richard Copley <rcopley@gmail.com>
Cc: 40661@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#40661: Crash in regex search during redisplay
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 10:24:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a9d50d4a-67fe-ad6f-2657-09b1eca55839@dancol.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPM58ohQC52=inqe3L=7jQDgoyATaCm+0RUw_t3W3WYe3=p0FQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 4/16/20 9:56 AM, Richard Copley wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Apr 2020 at 17:42, Daniel Colascione <dancol@dancol.org> wrote:
>>
>> On April 16, 2020 9:33:16 AM PDT, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> wrote:
>>>> Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 18:36:36 +0300
>>>> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>>>> Cc: 40661@debbugs.gnu.org
>>>>
>>>> Looks like GC sometimes kicks in while we are inside re_search_2
>>>
>>> Or not. I cannot get a breakpoint inside GC to fire while we are in
>>> search_buffer_re, so maybe my hypothesis was wrong. Although the
>>> symptoms are all there: when the segfault hits, the pointers passed to
>>> re_search_2 are invalid, but BEGV_ADDR and GAP_END_ADDR, from which
>>> they are supposed to be computed, are valid (and different). And the
>>> patch does seem to avoid the segfaults. But maybe it's just a
>>> coincidence or a side effect...
>>
>> Try using rr and see where those pointers came from
>
> It seems clear from "str1=str1@entry=0xc607fd", etc., that they come
> from the caller, search_buffer_re. The question is, why are they no
> longer valid after updating syntax?
Right. So let's see what updated the valid pointers and invalidated the
invalid ones.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-16 17:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 14:35 bug#40661: Crash in regex search during redisplay Richard Copley
2020-04-16 15:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-16 16:33 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-16 16:42 ` Daniel Colascione
2020-04-16 16:56 ` Richard Copley
2020-04-16 17:24 ` Daniel Colascione [this message]
2020-04-16 19:35 ` Richard Copley
2020-04-17 11:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-17 13:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-17 14:01 ` Daniel Colascione
2020-04-17 15:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-17 15:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-17 16:00 ` Stefan Monnier
2020-04-18 11:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-20 18:30 ` Richard Copley
2020-04-20 19:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-04-20 23:04 ` Richard Copley
2020-09-30 3:49 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2020-04-16 16:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a9d50d4a-67fe-ad6f-2657-09b1eca55839@dancol.org \
--to=dancol@dancol.org \
--cc=40661@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=rcopley@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).