* bug#6706: 24.0.50; // in some UNIX paths in Makefiles
@ 2010-07-22 18:32 Peter Dyballa
2010-07-22 20:29 ` Jan Djärv
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2010-07-22 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 6706
Hello!
When installing the NS variant (configured with --disable-ns-self-
contained) I see in make's output a few times paths with //. They're
caused by:
./Makefile:120:libexecdir=.../emacs/nextstep/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS//
libexec
./lib-src/Makefile:68:libexecdir=.../emacs/nextstep/Emacs.app/Contents/
MacOS//libexec
--
Greetings
Pete
What is this talk of 'release?' Klingons do not make software
'releases.' Our software 'escapes,' leaving a bloody trail of
designers and quality assurance people in its wake.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#6706: 24.0.50; // in some UNIX paths in Makefiles
2010-07-22 18:32 bug#6706: 24.0.50; // in some UNIX paths in Makefiles Peter Dyballa
@ 2010-07-22 20:29 ` Jan Djärv
2010-07-22 20:59 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jan Djärv @ 2010-07-22 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Dyballa; +Cc: 6706
Does it matter in any way? POSIX dictates that two or more slashes, when not
at the start of the path, is to be treated as a single slash. Does NS/OSX
treat them differently?
Jan D.
Peter Dyballa skrev 2010-07-22 20.32:
> Hello!
>
> When installing the NS variant (configured with --disable-ns-self-contained) I
> see in make's output a few times paths with //. They're caused by:
>
> ./Makefile:120:libexecdir=.../emacs/nextstep/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS//libexec
> ./lib-src/Makefile:68:libexecdir=.../emacs/nextstep/Emacs.app/Contents/MacOS//libexec
>
>
> --
> Greetings
>
> Pete
>
> What is this talk of 'release?' Klingons do not make software 'releases.' Our
> software 'escapes,' leaving a bloody trail of designers and quality assurance
> people in its wake.
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* bug#6706: 24.0.50; // in some UNIX paths in Makefiles
2010-07-22 20:29 ` Jan Djärv
@ 2010-07-22 20:59 ` Peter Dyballa
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Peter Dyballa @ 2010-07-22 20:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jan Djärv; +Cc: 6706
Am 22.07.2010 um 22:29 schrieb Jan Djärv:
> Does it matter in any way? POSIX dictates that two or more slashes,
> when not at the start of the path, is to be treated as a single
> slash. Does NS/OSX treat them differently?
Mac OS X's HFS variants handle them à la POSIX. And NS Emacs as well.
It's just not beautiful that they appear.
--
Greetings
Pete
Imbecility, n.:
A kind of divine inspiration, or sacred fire affecting censorious
critics of this dictionary.
– Ambrose Bierce: _The Devil's Dictionary_
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-07-22 20:59 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-07-22 18:32 bug#6706: 24.0.50; // in some UNIX paths in Makefiles Peter Dyballa
2010-07-22 20:29 ` Jan Djärv
2010-07-22 20:59 ` Peter Dyballa
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).