bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

[Unknown]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 124 bytes --]


There's a missing full stop at the end of a paragraph in the MS-DOS
processes documentation. The attached patch fixes it.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-Add-missing-full-stop-in-MS-DOS-processes-documentat.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 919 bytes --]

From 5727d194ff84e106183befcc64c76a56e8ef352d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Daniel=20Mart=C3=ADn?= <mardani29@yahoo.es>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2020 01:00:26 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

---
 doc/emacs/msdos-xtra.texi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/doc/emacs/msdos-xtra.texi b/doc/emacs/msdos-xtra.texi
index 230e918c84..045ac6c460 100644
--- a/doc/emacs/msdos-xtra.texi
+++ b/doc/emacs/msdos-xtra.texi
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@ MS-DOS Processes
 
   Spell checking also works, by means of special support for synchronous
 invocation of the @code{ispell} program.  This is slower than the
-asynchronous invocation on other platforms
+asynchronous invocation on other platforms.
 
   Instead of the Shell mode, which doesn't work on MS-DOS, you can use
 the @kbd{M-x eshell} command.  This invokes the Eshell package that
-- 
2.28.0

bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Daniel Martín <mardani29@yahoo.es> writes:

> There's a missing full stop at the end of a paragraph in the MS-DOS
> processes documentation. The attached patch fixes it.

Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 (and I'll cherry-pick it for Emacs 27).

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

[Glenn Morris]

Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:

> Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 (and I'll cherry-pick it for Emacs 27).

Why not apply just to emacs-27, and let it get merged to master, per eg
CONTRIBUTE?

> close 43820 28.1

Why not 27.2?

(Is this enough nit picking for a "." I wonder...)

bug#43820: 27.1; [PATCH] Missing full stop in MS-DOS processes documentation

[Lars Ingebrigtsen]

Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:

> Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>
>> Thanks; applied to Emacs 28 (and I'll cherry-pick it for Emacs 27).
>
> Why not apply just to emacs-27, and let it get merged to master, per eg
> CONTRIBUTE?

Because I had already applied it to Emacs 28 when that occurred to
me...  does cherry-picking make stuff harder for you when doing the
merges from emacs-27 to the trunk?

>> close 43820 28.1
>
> Why not 27.2?

Does anybody actually use those markings for anything?

> (Is this enough nit picking for a "." I wonder...)

I think it's the max!

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no