unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Cc: 50459@debbugs.gnu.org, Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>,
	Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>,
	joaotavora@gmail.com
Subject: bug#50459: 28.0.50; Python shell completion is incompatible with flex, orderless, etc.
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:50:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgskejjq.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877dfopsoa.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2021 13:37:57 +0200")

On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 at 13:37, Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:

> Augusto Stoffel <arstoffel@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> To alleviate this, the completion-at-point function could implement some
>> sort of caching.  The difficult question is when to invalidate the
>> cache.  I've attached one possiblility as a draft patch.  If the
>> approach seems reasonable, then I'll format it properly.
>
> Would it be possible to do caching at a lower level instead of in
> python-mode?

I'm not an expert in this either, but I think the caching mechanism
would be pretty particular to the circumstances of each completion
table, so it indeed belongs here.  Maybe João can say more?

Since this comint-based completion is not super smart (it's not
context-dependent at all), the rather naive caching invalidation used
here seems sufficient to me.

>
>> As a side effect, the patch also solves the original issue described in
>> this ticket.
>
> [...]
>
>> -    (list start end
>> -          (completion-table-dynamic
>> -           (apply-partially
>> -            completion-fn
>> -            process import-statement)))))
>> +    (let  ((re (or (car python-shell--capf-cache) regexp-unmatchable))
>> +           (prefix (buffer-substring-no-properties start end)))
>> +      (unless (string-match re prefix)
>> +        (setq python-shell--capf-cache
>> + (cons (concat "\\`" (regexp-quote prefix)
>> "\\(?:\\sw\\|\\s_\\)*\\'")
>> + (funcall completion-fn process import-statement prefix)))))
>> +    (list start end (cdr python-shell--capf-cache))))
>
> I'm not sure I understand this patch -- it's not using
> `completion-table-dynamic' at all now?  (But my understanding of the
> completion functions in Emacs is pretty lacking.)

That's true: the logic here is that the completions are computed
eagerly, and then cached until still valid.  So if you type

  fo<tab>o.bar.baz

the inferior process is contacted 3 times: after the <tab>, and after
each dot.  Before, a lazy table was returned, but the inferior would be
contacted after each character anyway (if using Company or similar).





  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-10 11:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-07 17:52 bug#50459: 28.0.50; Python shell completion is incompatible with flex, orderless, etc Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-08 17:44 ` Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-09  7:11   ` Michael Albinus
2021-09-09  7:32     ` Gregory Heytings
2021-09-09  7:30 ` Gregory Heytings
2021-09-09  7:40   ` Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-09  7:49     ` Gregory Heytings
2021-09-09  8:45       ` Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-09  8:50         ` Gregory Heytings
2021-09-09 16:46           ` Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-10 11:37             ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-09-10 11:50               ` Augusto Stoffel [this message]
2021-09-10 13:14                 ` João Távora
2021-09-10 13:28                   ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-10 14:06                     ` João Távora
2021-09-10 14:22                       ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-10 14:39                         ` João Távora
2021-09-10 14:43                           ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-10 19:27                             ` Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-10 20:08                               ` João Távora
2021-09-11 12:09                 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-09-11 12:34                   ` Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-11 12:36                     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-09-10 13:32             ` Dmitry Gutov
2021-09-10 19:08 ` bug#50459: 28.0.50; [PATCH] " Augusto Stoffel
2021-09-11 12:50   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87zgskejjq.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=arstoffel@gmail.com \
    --cc=50459@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=gregory@heytings.org \
    --cc=joaotavora@gmail.com \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    --cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).