* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
@ 2009-11-10 8:26 Helmut Eller
2009-11-12 7:23 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Helmut Eller @ 2009-11-10 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-pretest-bug
The key binding for ? in the minibuffer can be very annoying for the
Info-index command. Some languages, e.g. Forth or Scheme, have the
convention to append a question mark to predicate names and so typing a
plain ? is needed rather often.
Also, ? seems to do almost the same as TAB.
Please make ? a self-inserting command in the minibuffer.
Helmut
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
2009-11-10 8:26 bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer Helmut Eller
@ 2009-11-12 7:23 ` Glenn Morris
2009-11-12 7:30 ` Processed: " Emacs bug Tracking System
2019-11-02 5:25 ` Stefan Kangas
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2009-11-12 7:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Helmut Eller; +Cc: 4897
severity 4897 wishlist
stop
Helmut Eller wrote:
> The key binding for ? in the minibuffer can be very annoying for the
> Info-index command.
It behaves the same way as in the stand-alone info reader.
You can use `C-q ?' for a literal '?'.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Processed: Re: bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
2009-11-12 7:23 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2009-11-12 7:30 ` Emacs bug Tracking System
2019-11-02 5:25 ` Stefan Kangas
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-11-12 7:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Emacs Bugs
Processing commands for control@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com:
> severity 4897 wishlist
Bug #4897 [emacs] 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
> stop
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Don Armstrong
(administrator, Emacs bugs database)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
2009-11-12 7:23 ` Glenn Morris
2009-11-12 7:30 ` Processed: " Emacs bug Tracking System
@ 2019-11-02 5:25 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-02 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-02 15:22 ` Drew Adams
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-02 5:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Helmut Eller, 4897
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> severity 4897 wishlist
> stop
>
> Helmut Eller wrote:
>
>> The key binding for ? in the minibuffer can be very annoying for the
>> Info-index command.
>
> It behaves the same way as in the stand-alone info reader.
> You can use `C-q ?' for a literal '?'.
IMO, it would be better to remove the "?" binding. One could use
the more natural "TAB" binding instead.
However, given that this is very long-standing behaviour, can we
really change it now? Any opinions?
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
2019-11-02 5:25 ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2019-11-02 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-02 8:54 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-02 15:22 ` Drew Adams
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2019-11-02 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: eller.helmut, 4897
> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 06:25:07 +0100
> Cc: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>, 4897@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> >> The key binding for ? in the minibuffer can be very annoying for the
> >> Info-index command.
> >
> > It behaves the same way as in the stand-alone info reader.
> > You can use `C-q ?' for a literal '?'.
>
> IMO, it would be better to remove the "?" binding. One could use
> the more natural "TAB" binding instead.
>
> However, given that this is very long-standing behaviour, can we
> really change it now? Any opinions?
It is very unusual for an index entry to include the question mark, so
I think the case for the change is quite weak.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
2019-11-02 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2019-11-02 8:54 ` Stefan Kangas
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-02 8:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: eller.helmut, 4897
tags 4897 + wontfix
close 4897
thanks
Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
>
> > From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> > Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2019 06:25:07 +0100
> > Cc: Helmut Eller <eller.helmut@gmail.com>, 4897@debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > >> The key binding for ? in the minibuffer can be very annoying for the
> > >> Info-index command.
> > >
> > > It behaves the same way as in the stand-alone info reader.
> > > You can use `C-q ?' for a literal '?'.
> >
> > IMO, it would be better to remove the "?" binding. One could use
> > the more natural "TAB" binding instead.
> >
> > However, given that this is very long-standing behaviour, can we
> > really change it now? Any opinions?
>
> It is very unusual for an index entry to include the question mark, so
> I think the case for the change is quite weak.
That makes sense. I'm consequently closing the bug as wontfix.
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
2019-11-02 5:25 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-02 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2019-11-02 15:22 ` Drew Adams
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-02 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Kangas, Glenn Morris; +Cc: Helmut Eller, 4897
> > It behaves the same way as in the stand-alone info reader.
> > You can use `C-q ?' for a literal '?'.
>
> IMO, it would be better to remove the "?" binding. One could use
> the more natural "TAB" binding instead.
>
> However, given that this is very long-standing behaviour, can we
> really change it now? Any opinions?
One opinion: go ahead and remove it.
Anyone who really wants it can add it back
individually.
But it would be good to hear from others,
including anyone who uses it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer
[not found] ` <<83eeyqk7yu.fsf@gnu.org>
@ 2019-11-02 15:38 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2019-11-02 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eli Zaretskii, Stefan Kangas; +Cc: eller.helmut, 4897
> It is very unusual for an index entry to include the question mark, so
> I think the case for the change is quite weak.
That's true. And the fact that using `?'
immediately shows `*Help*' helps (especially if
that help tells you about `?' - see below).
So I retract my vote to remove it.
___
However, it might be better for the displayed help
to not immediately disappear if you click it or
try to search it (`C-s'), etc., and to put it into
a separate window. I.e., let it just do what
`C-h m' does.
And it might be better for the displayed help to
put this first line before other key descriptions:
? Display this help. (`C-q ?' inserts `?'.)
h Invoke the Info tutorial.
q Quit Info: reselect previously selected buffer.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-11-02 15:38 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-10 8:26 bug#4897: 23.1.50; Info-index and ? in minibuffer Helmut Eller
2009-11-12 7:23 ` Glenn Morris
2009-11-12 7:30 ` Processed: " Emacs bug Tracking System
2019-11-02 5:25 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-02 8:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-11-02 8:54 ` Stefan Kangas
2019-11-02 15:22 ` Drew Adams
[not found] <<m27hty7pla.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <<bh1vk4yzn5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <<87sgn6hmto.fsf@marxist.se>
[not found] ` <<83eeyqk7yu.fsf@gnu.org>
2019-11-02 15:38 ` Drew Adams
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).