unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
       [not found] <87k0gb2z1g.fsf.ref@yahoo.com>
@ 2021-12-11 10:53 ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
  2021-12-12  6:06   ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors @ 2021-12-11 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 52428

On MS-DOS, start eshell, and type any command that will result in a
synchronous subprocess being started:

c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello

Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
with `eshell-processp'.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
  2021-12-11 10:53 ` bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
@ 2021-12-12  6:06   ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
  2021-12-12  7:38     ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors @ 2021-12-12  6:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 52428; +Cc: Eli Zaretskii

Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com> writes:

> On MS-DOS, start eshell, and type any command that will result in a
> synchronous subprocess being started:
>
> c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello
>
> Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
> uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
> with `eshell-processp'.

If nobody minds, I'll fix this on the release branch by replacing those
calls with `eshell-processp'.

Eli, is that okay?  Thanks.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
  2021-12-12  6:06   ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
@ 2021-12-12  7:38     ` Eli Zaretskii
  2021-12-12  7:51       ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2021-12-12  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Po Lu; +Cc: 52428

> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:06:35 +0800
> 
> > c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello
> >
> > Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
> > uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
> > with `eshell-processp'.
> 
> If nobody minds, I'll fix this on the release branch by replacing those
> calls with `eshell-processp'.
> 
> Eli, is that okay?

Yes, of course.  Eshell should never directly call 'processp', except
perhaps in code that makes no sense and isn't called on MS-DOS.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS
  2021-12-12  7:38     ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2021-12-12  7:51       ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors @ 2021-12-12  7:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: 52428-done

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Po Lu <luangruo@yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
>> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 14:06:35 +0800
>> 
>> > c:/djgpp/bin $ djecho hello
>> >
>> > Eshell will complain that `processp' is unbound, because there are two
>> > uses of `processp' in `eshell-eval-command' that need to be replaced
>> > with `eshell-processp'.
>> 
>> If nobody minds, I'll fix this on the release branch by replacing those
>> calls with `eshell-processp'.
>> 
>> Eli, is that okay?
>
> Yes, of course.  Eshell should never directly call 'processp', except
> perhaps in code that makes no sense and isn't called on MS-DOS.

Done, and I'm closing this bug.  Thanks!





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-12  7:51 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <87k0gb2z1g.fsf.ref@yahoo.com>
2021-12-11 10:53 ` bug#52428: 28.0.90; Eshell complains that `processp' is unbound on MS-DOS Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-12-12  6:06   ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-12-12  7:38     ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-12-12  7:51       ` Po Lu via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).