* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails @ 2009-07-27 19:45 ` Torsten Bronger 2009-07-28 10:34 ` Daiki Ueno [not found] ` <handler.3953.C.124996607716130.notifdonectrl.5@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com> 0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-27 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-pretest-bug In response to bug report #2412: Daiki Ueno <ueno@unixuser.org> writes: > Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> writes: > >>> - (accept-process-output (epg-context-process context) 1))) >>> + (accept-process-output (epg-context-process context) 1)) >>> + (sleep-for 0.1)) >> >> That seems to do the trick. At least, I had no problem in ~15 attempts >> to preview/send signed messages, whereas without your patch the "Sign >> failed" error would happen about every second time. > > Thanks for testing. I've checked in the patch. I experience the same problem but the above patch doesn't really help me. Without the sleeping time, I get failures with signature checking of incoming emails almost always; with the sleeping time, it works at least in 20% of the cases. I increased the time to even 10 seconds but the success rate didn't increase further. The behaviour remains probabilistic. All aspects of GPG interaction -- signature checking, signing and encrypting -- are affected by this behaviour. Tschö, Torsten. In GNU Emacs 23.0.94.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) of 2009-06-07 on wilson Windowing system distributor `The X.Org Foundation', version 11.0.10600000 configured using `configure '--prefix=/usr/local/' '--mandir=/usr/local/share/man/' '--infodir=/usr/local/share/info/' '--with-x-toolkit=no' '--with-xpm' '--with-jpeg' '--with-tiff' '--with-gif' '--with-png' '--with-x'' Important settings: value of $LC_ALL: nil value of $LC_COLLATE: nil value of $LC_CTYPE: nil value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil value of $LC_MONETARY: nil value of $LC_NUMERIC: nil value of $LC_TIME: nil value of $LANG: de_DE.UTF-8 value of $XMODIFIERS: nil locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix default-enable-multibyte-characters: t Major mode: Group Minor modes in effect: gnus-topic-mode: t gnus-undo-mode: t shell-dirtrack-mode: t global-auto-revert-mode: t savehist-mode: t display-time-mode: t desktop-save-mode: t mouse-wheel-mode: t global-font-lock-mode: t font-lock-mode: t global-auto-composition-mode: t auto-composition-mode: t auto-encryption-mode: t auto-compression-mode: t line-number-mode: t ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-27 19:45 ` bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-28 10:34 ` Daiki Ueno 2009-07-28 21:25 ` Torsten Bronger [not found] ` <handler.3953.C.124996607716130.notifdonectrl.5@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com> 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-28 10:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Torsten Bronger; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 reopen 2412 merge 2412 3953 thanks >>>>> In <20090727194515.F1958E42E9@wilson.homeunix.com> >>>>> Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > >>> - (accept-process-output (epg-context-process context) 1))) > >>> + (accept-process-output (epg-context-process context) 1)) > >>> + (sleep-for 0.1)) > >> > >> That seems to do the trick. At least, I had no problem in ~15 attempts > >> to preview/send signed messages, whereas without your patch the "Sign > >> failed" error would happen about every second time. > > > > Thanks for testing. I've checked in the patch. > I experience the same problem but the above patch doesn't really > help me. Without the sleeping time, I get failures with signature > checking of incoming emails almost always; with the sleeping time, > it works at least in 20% of the cases. I increased the time to even > 10 seconds but the success rate didn't increase further. The > behaviour remains probabilistic. Thanks for further testing. Well, in that case an essential part of process-filter might not be executed in 20% of the cases. Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with: (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "") change the situation? Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-28 10:34 ` Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-28 21:25 ` Torsten Bronger 2009-07-28 22:54 ` Daiki Ueno 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-28 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daiki Ueno; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 Hallöchen! Daiki Ueno writes: > [...] > >> I experience the same problem but the above patch doesn't really >> help me. Without the sleeping time, I get failures with >> signature checking of incoming emails almost always; with the >> sleeping time, it works at least in 20% of the cases. I >> increased the time to even 10 seconds but the success rate didn't >> increase further. The behaviour remains probabilistic. > > Thanks for further testing. Well, in that case an essential part of > process-filter might not be executed in 20% of the cases. > > Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with: > > (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "") > > change the situation? It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only slightly. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-28 21:25 ` Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-28 22:54 ` Daiki Ueno 2009-07-29 19:26 ` Torsten Bronger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-28 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Torsten Bronger; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 >>>>> In <87ws5sv6tb.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> >>>>> Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with: > > > > (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "") > > > > change the situation? > It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only > slightly. Hmm, is your epg-debug output as innocent as the one that the original reporter provided? Currently, I suspect that the code in the following clause might be skipped: (unless epg-process-filter-running ...) Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It would be something like: (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-28 22:54 ` Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-29 19:26 ` Torsten Bronger 2009-07-29 23:59 ` Daiki Ueno 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-29 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daiki Ueno; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 Hallöchen! Daiki Ueno writes: > [...] > >>> Does replacing (sleep-for 0.1) with: >>> >>> (epg--process-filter (epg-context-process context) "") >>> >>> change the situation? > >> It has the same effect as (sleep-for 0.1): It helps, but only >> slightly. > > Hmm, is your epg-debug output as innocent as the one that the original > reporter provided? It's every time: gpg --no-tty --status-fd 1 --yes --command-fd 0 --output /tmp/epg-output6267bsQ - [GNUPG:] PLAINTEXT 74 0 gpg: Signatur am Mo 29 Jun 2009 10:31:28 CEST mit DSA Schlüssel, ID 9F516B77, erfolgt [GNUPG:] SIG_ID jkbjBUZ5Lu5ozCYNw6Tsx9qYwsY 2009-06-29 1246264288 [GNUPG:] GOODSIG D5E3CEFC9F516B77 Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> gpg: Korrekte Unterschrift von 'Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de>' [GNUPG:] VALIDSIG C5C8D6E279D2EFE98C0F6D77D5E3CEFC9F516B77 2009-06-29 1246264288 0 3 0 17 2 01 C5C8D6E279D2EFE98C0F6D77D5E3CEFC9F516B77 [GNUPG:] TRUST_ULTIMATE > Currently, I suspect that the code in the following clause might be > skipped: > > (unless epg-process-filter-running ...) > > Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It would be > something like: > > (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) And where should I put it exactly? (I don't speak Lisp.) I now wrote (unless epg-process-filter-running (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) And then, *Messages* say epg-process-filter-running: nil Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-29 19:26 ` Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-29 23:59 ` Daiki Ueno 2009-07-30 4:57 ` Torsten Bronger 2009-08-16 11:30 ` Torsten Bronger 0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-29 23:59 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Torsten Bronger; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 >>>>> In <87vdlbtho2.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> >>>>> Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > > Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It would be > > something like: > > > > (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) > And where should I put it exactly? Like this: (defun epg-wait-for-completion (context) "Wait until the `epg-gpg-program' process completes." (while (eq (process-status (epg-context-process context)) 'run) (accept-process-output (epg-context-process context) 1)) (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) ;; <- (sleep-for 0.1) (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) ;; <- ) Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-29 23:59 ` Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-30 4:57 ` Torsten Bronger 2009-07-30 5:05 ` Daiki Ueno 2009-08-16 11:30 ` Torsten Bronger 1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-30 4:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daiki Ueno; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 Hallöchen! Daiki Ueno writes: > [...] > >>> Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It >>> would be something like: >>> >>> (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) > >> And where should I put it exactly? > > Like this: > > (defun epg-wait-for-completion (context) > "Wait until the `epg-gpg-program' process completes." > (while (eq (process-status (epg-context-process context)) 'run) > (accept-process-output (epg-context-process context) 1)) > (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) ;; <- > (sleep-for 0.1) > (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) ;; <- > ) I get (no matter whether Gnus shows the correct result or not): epg-process-filter-running: nil [2 times] Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-30 4:57 ` Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-30 5:05 ` Daiki Ueno 2009-07-30 5:43 ` Torsten Bronger 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-30 5:05 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Torsten Bronger; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 >>>>> In <87ab2mzs2i.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> >>>>> Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > >>> Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It > >>> would be something like: > >>> > >>> (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) > I get (no matter whether Gnus shows the correct result or not): > epg-process-filter-running: nil [2 times] Do you get the same result on both successful and failed cases? (Since I have never been able to reproduce the problem at all, I need data on failed cases). Regards, -- Daiki Ueno ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-30 5:05 ` Daiki Ueno @ 2009-07-30 5:43 ` Torsten Bronger 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-07-30 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daiki Ueno; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 Hallöchen! Daiki Ueno writes: >>>>>> In <87ab2mzs2i.fsf@physik.rwth-aachen.de> >>>>>> Torsten Bronger <bronger@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: >> >>> Can you insert debug-prints in epg-wait-for-completion? It >> >>> would be something like: >> >>> >> >>> (message "epg-process-filter-running: %S" epg-process-filter-running) > >> I get (no matter whether Gnus shows the correct result or not): > >> epg-process-filter-running: nil [2 times] > > Do you get the same result on both successful and failed cases? Yes. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails 2009-07-29 23:59 ` Daiki Ueno 2009-07-30 4:57 ` Torsten Bronger @ 2009-08-16 11:30 ` Torsten Bronger 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-08-16 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Daiki Ueno; +Cc: emacs-pretest-bug, 3953 Hallöchen! Why was this bug closed? The problem still persists. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <handler.3953.C.124996607716130.notifdonectrl.5@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>]
* bug#3953: acknowledged by developer (process bugs) [not found] ` <handler.3953.C.124996607716130.notifdonectrl.5@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com> @ 2009-08-12 13:30 ` Torsten Bronger 2009-08-26 11:51 ` Sven Joachim 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Torsten Bronger @ 2009-08-12 13:30 UTC (permalink / raw) To: 3953 Hallöchen! Emacs bug Tracking System writes: > This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report > #3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, > which was filed against the emacs package. > > It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely > Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>. > > You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, > in case you haven't already. If not, please contact them directly. Why was the bug closed? I still see the problem. Tschö, Torsten. -- Torsten Bronger, aquisgrana, europa vetus Jabber ID: torsten.bronger@jabber.rwth-aachen.de or http://bronger-jmp.appspot.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* bug#3953: acknowledged by developer (process bugs) 2009-08-12 13:30 ` bug#3953: acknowledged by developer (process bugs) Torsten Bronger @ 2009-08-26 11:51 ` Sven Joachim 2009-08-26 12:00 ` Processed: Re: bug#3953 " Emacs bug Tracking System 0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread From: Sven Joachim @ 2009-08-26 11:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Torsten Bronger; +Cc: 3953, Daiki Ueno, Chong Yidong reopen 3953 thanks Am 12.08.2009 um 15:30 schrieb Torsten Bronger: > Hallöchen! > > Emacs bug Tracking System writes: > >> This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report >> #3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails, >> which was filed against the emacs package. >> >> It has been marked as closed by one of the developers, namely >> Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>. >> >> You should be hearing from them with a substantive response shortly, >> in case you haven't already. If not, please contact them directly. > > Why was the bug closed? I still see the problem. Reopening the bug then, awaiting further explanations from Daiki and Yidong. Cheers, Sven ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Processed: Re: bug#3953 acknowledged by developer (process bugs) 2009-08-26 11:51 ` Sven Joachim @ 2009-08-26 12:00 ` Emacs bug Tracking System 0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-08-26 12:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Sven Joachim; +Cc: Emacs Bugs Processing commands for control@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com: > reopen 3953 Bug #3953 {Done: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>} [emacs] 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails Bug #2412 {Done: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>} [emacs] spurious "Sign failed" errors > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Don Armstrong (administrator, Emacs bugs database) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Processed: process bugs [not found] <878whrarbh.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> 2009-07-27 19:45 ` bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails Torsten Bronger @ 2009-08-11 4:55 ` Emacs bug Tracking System 1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2009-08-11 4:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Chong Yidong Cc: bug 535 done for {535}, bug 2445 done for {2445}, bug 1124 done for {1124}, bug 1493 done for {1493}, bug 2614 done for {2614}, bug 3953 done for {3953}, bug 1583 done for {1583}, bug 2412 done for {2412}, spam for {4106, 4111, 4098, 4099, 4105, 4104}, Emacs Bugs [-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --] [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3511 bytes --] Processing commands for control@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com: > close 535 bug#535: Problem with highlit regions on Linux virtual terminal 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug closed, send any further explanations to Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> > tags 850 + unreproducible moreinfo bug#850: 23.0.60; make autoloads reports memory exhaustion Tags were: unreproducible Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > close 882 bug#882: [emacs-snapshot] Wrong size of frame when maximized at startup. 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug is already closed, cannot re-close. > close 1124 bug#1124: 23.0.60; starts off-screen 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug closed, send any further explanations to "Nathan Klatt" <n8klatt@gmail.com> > tags 1490 + wontfix bug#1490: 23.0.60; C-d sends "\n" while debugging with gdb in Emacs There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > close 1493 bug#1493: 23.0.60; make-frame-on-display segfaults 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug closed, send any further explanations to "Oscar Fuentes" <ofv@wanadoo.es> > close 1583 bug#1583: 23.0.60; set-fontset-font doesn't work for ascii charset 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug closed, send any further explanations to "Qichen Huang" <unicad.el@gmail.com> > tags 1591 + unreproducible moreinfo bug#1591: Failed to compile emacs from CVS with the new glibc-2.9-3.i686 There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > tags 1642 + unreproducible moreinfo bug#1642: grep fails with "Can't exec program" There were no tags set. Tags added: unreproducible, moreinfo > close 2412 bug#2412: spurious "Sign failed" errors 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails bug closed, send any further explanations to Sven Joachim <svenjoac@gmx.de> > close 2445 bug#2445: 23.0.90; file name completion GCs a lot 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug closed, send any further explanations to rms@gnu.org > close 2614 bug#2614: 20.0.91; coredump if cannot find stuff on startup 'close' is deprecated; see http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/Developer.html#closing. bug closed, send any further explanations to "Marshall, Simon" <Simon.Marshall@misys.com> > reassign 4098 spam bug#4098: OFFICIAL Warning: Unknown package 'spam' bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `spam'. > reassign 4099 spam bug#4099: OFFICIAL Warning: Unknown package 'spam' bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `spam'. > reassign 4104 spam bug#4104: O primeiro confocal de varedura a laser Warning: Unknown package 'spam' bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `spam'. > reassign 4105 spam bug#4105: O primeiro confocal de varedura a laser Warning: Unknown package 'spam' bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `spam'. > reassign 4106 spam bug#4106: Profitez de -30% sur votre mutuelle Warning: Unknown package 'spam' bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `spam'. > reassign 4111 spam bug#4111: Programación Dinámica e Interactiva Actualizate... Warning: Unknown package 'spam' bug reassigned from package `emacs' to `spam'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Don Armstrong (administrator, Emacs bugs database) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-08-26 12:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <878whrarbh.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
2009-07-27 19:45 ` bug#3953: 23.0.94; GPG interaction fails Torsten Bronger
2009-07-28 10:34 ` Daiki Ueno
2009-07-28 21:25 ` Torsten Bronger
2009-07-28 22:54 ` Daiki Ueno
2009-07-29 19:26 ` Torsten Bronger
2009-07-29 23:59 ` Daiki Ueno
2009-07-30 4:57 ` Torsten Bronger
2009-07-30 5:05 ` Daiki Ueno
2009-07-30 5:43 ` Torsten Bronger
2009-08-16 11:30 ` Torsten Bronger
[not found] ` <handler.3953.C.124996607716130.notifdonectrl.5@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>
2009-08-12 13:30 ` bug#3953: acknowledged by developer (process bugs) Torsten Bronger
2009-08-26 11:51 ` Sven Joachim
2009-08-26 12:00 ` Processed: Re: bug#3953 " Emacs bug Tracking System
2009-08-11 4:55 ` Processed: process bugs Emacs bug Tracking System
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).