* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
@ 2015-09-12 3:36 Stefan Monnier
2015-10-29 13:09 ` Stefan Monnier
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2015-09-12 3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 21466; +Cc: bug-cc-mode
Package: Emacs
Version: 25.0.50
CC-mode currently defines various non-CC-mode variables and functions
with dummy values, as a way to avoid byte-compiler warnings when using
those external vars/functions.
Since this is dangerous business, CC-mode has to be extra careful to
undo such settings when they're not needed any more.
It might have made sense back in the days when the byte-compiler did not
offer built-in ways to silence those warnings, but nowadays we can
do better.
Any objections to the patch below (which also removes the unused
cc-bytecomp-put, while we're at it)?
Stefan
2015-09-12 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
* lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el: Use newer compiler-silencers.
(cc-bytecomp-defvar): Use just (defvar <foo>) when that is known to
silence the byte-compiler warnings.
(cc-bytecomp-defun): Use just (declare-function <foo>) when that is
known to silence the byte-compiler warnings.
(cc-bytecomp-boundp, cc-bytecomp-fboundp): Change accordingly.
(cc-bytecomp-put): Remove, unused.
(cc-bytecomp-original-properties): Remove var.
(cc-bytecomp-setup-environment, cc-bytecomp-restore-environment):
Don't use cc-bytecomp-original-properties any more.
diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
index 81b7a82..fff2a9e 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
@@ -75,12 +75,10 @@
(defvar cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
(defvar cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
-(defvar cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
(defvar cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
(setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
(setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
-(setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
(setq cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
(defvar cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
@@ -173,16 +171,6 @@ perhaps a `cc-bytecomp-restore-environment' is forgotten somewhere"))
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
"cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Covered function %s" fun))))
(setq p (cdr p)))
- (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
- (while p
- (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
- (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
- (tempdef (car (cdr (car p)))))
- (put sym prop tempdef)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
- prop sym tempdef))
- (setq p (cdr p)))
(setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set t)
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
"cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Done"))))
@@ -232,22 +220,6 @@ perhaps a `cc-bytecomp-restore-environment' is forgotten somewhere"))
"cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring function %s"
fun))))
(setq p (cdr p)))
- (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
- (while p
- (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
- (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
- (tempdef (car (cdr (car p))))
- (origdef (cdr (cdr (car p)))))
- (if (eq (get sym prop) tempdef)
- (progn
- (put sym prop origdef)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Restored property %s for %s to %s"
- prop sym origdef))
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring property %s for %s"
- prop sym)))
- (setq p (cdr p)))
(setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
"cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Done"))))
@@ -348,25 +320,28 @@ afterwards. Don't use within `eval-when-compile'."
(eval-when-compile (cc-bytecomp-setup-environment))))
(defmacro cc-bytecomp-defvar (var)
- "Binds the symbol as a variable during compilation of the file,
+ "Bind the symbol as a variable during compilation of the file,
to silence the byte compiler. Don't use within `eval-when-compile'."
- `(eval-when-compile
- (if (boundp ',var)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
- (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
- (progn
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
- (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
- (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
- (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
- (progn
- (defvar ,var)
- (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
- (symbol-name ',var))))
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var))))))
+ (if (not (featurep 'xemacs))
+ `(defvar ,var)
+ ;; Not sure if XEmacs's ‘defvar’ works in the same way.
+ `(eval-when-compile
+ (if (boundp ',var)
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
+ (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
+ (progn
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
+ (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
+ (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
+ (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (progn
+ (defvar ,var)
+ (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
+ (symbol-name ',var))))
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var)))))))
(defmacro cc-bytecomp-defun (fun)
"Bind the symbol as a function during compilation of the file,
@@ -377,48 +352,33 @@ definition. That means that this macro will not shut up warnings
about incorrect number of arguments. It's dangerous to try to replace
existing functions since the byte compiler might need the definition
at compile time, e.g. for macros and inline functions."
- `(eval-when-compile
- (if (fboundp ',fun)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
- (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
- (progn
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
- (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
- (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
- cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
- (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
- (progn
- (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
- (symbol-name ',fun))))
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun))))))
-
-(defmacro cc-bytecomp-put (symbol propname value)
- "Set a property on a symbol during compilation (and evaluation) of
-the file. Don't use outside `eval-when-compile'."
- `(eval-when-compile
- (if (not (assoc (cons ,symbol ,propname) cc-bytecomp-original-properties))
- (progn
+ (if (fboundp 'declare-function)
+ `(declare-function ,fun nil)
+ `(eval-when-compile
+ (if (fboundp ',fun)
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-put: Saving property %s for %s with value %s"
- ,propname ,symbol (get ,symbol ,propname))
- (setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties
- (cons (cons (cons ,symbol ,propname)
- (cons ,value (get ,symbol ,propname)))
- cc-bytecomp-original-properties))))
- (put ,symbol ,propname ,value)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-put: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
- ,propname ,symbol ,value)))
+ "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
+ (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
+ (progn
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
+ (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
+ (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
+ cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
+ (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (progn
+ (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
+ (symbol-name ',fun))))
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun)))))))
(defmacro cc-bytecomp-boundp (symbol)
"Return non-nil if the given symbol is bound as a variable outside
the compilation. This is the same as using `boundp' but additionally
exclude any variables that have been bound during compilation with
`cc-bytecomp-defvar'."
- (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (if (and (featurep 'xemacs)
+ (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
(memq (car (cdr symbol)) cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
nil
`(boundp ,symbol)))
@@ -429,7 +389,8 @@ the compilation. This is the same as using `fboundp' but additionally
exclude any functions that have been bound during compilation with
`cc-bytecomp-defun'."
(let (fun-elem)
- (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (if (and (not (fboundp 'declare-function))
+ (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
(setq fun-elem (assq (car (cdr symbol))
cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
(eq (elt fun-elem 2) 'unbound))
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2015-09-12 3:36 bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions Stefan Monnier
@ 2015-10-29 13:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-11-06 1:29 ` Stefan Kangas
2021-05-10 11:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2015-10-29 13:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 21466
Ping?
Stefan
>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Package: Emacs
> Version: 25.0.50
> CC-mode currently defines various non-CC-mode variables and functions
> with dummy values, as a way to avoid byte-compiler warnings when using
> those external vars/functions.
> Since this is dangerous business, CC-mode has to be extra careful to
> undo such settings when they're not needed any more.
> It might have made sense back in the days when the byte-compiler did not
> offer built-in ways to silence those warnings, but nowadays we can
> do better.
> Any objections to the patch below (which also removes the unused
> cc-bytecomp-put, while we're at it)?
> Stefan
> 2015-09-12 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
> * lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el: Use newer compiler-silencers.
> (cc-bytecomp-defvar): Use just (defvar <foo>) when that is known to
> silence the byte-compiler warnings.
> (cc-bytecomp-defun): Use just (declare-function <foo>) when that is
> known to silence the byte-compiler warnings.
> (cc-bytecomp-boundp, cc-bytecomp-fboundp): Change accordingly.
> (cc-bytecomp-put): Remove, unused.
> (cc-bytecomp-original-properties): Remove var.
> (cc-bytecomp-setup-environment, cc-bytecomp-restore-environment):
> Don't use cc-bytecomp-original-properties any more.
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
> index 81b7a82..fff2a9e 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
> @@ -75,12 +75,10 @@
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
> -(defvar cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
> (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
> (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
> -(setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
> (setq cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
> @@ -173,16 +171,6 @@ perhaps a `cc-bytecomp-restore-environment' is forgotten somewhere"))
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Covered function %s" fun))))
> (setq p (cdr p)))
> - (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
> - (while p
> - (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
> - (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
> - (tempdef (car (cdr (car p)))))
> - (put sym prop tempdef)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
> - prop sym tempdef))
> - (setq p (cdr p)))
> (setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set t)
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Done"))))
> @@ -232,22 +220,6 @@ perhaps a `cc-bytecomp-restore-environment' is forgotten somewhere"))
> "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring function %s"
> fun))))
> (setq p (cdr p)))
> - (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
> - (while p
> - (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
> - (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
> - (tempdef (car (cdr (car p))))
> - (origdef (cdr (cdr (car p)))))
> - (if (eq (get sym prop) tempdef)
> - (progn
> - (put sym prop origdef)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Restored property %s for %s to %s"
> - prop sym origdef))
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring property %s for %s"
> - prop sym)))
> - (setq p (cdr p)))
> (setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Done"))))
> @@ -348,25 +320,28 @@ afterwards. Don't use within `eval-when-compile'."
> (eval-when-compile (cc-bytecomp-setup-environment))))
> (defmacro cc-bytecomp-defvar (var)
> - "Binds the symbol as a variable during compilation of the file,
> + "Bind the symbol as a variable during compilation of the file,
> to silence the byte compiler. Don't use within `eval-when-compile'."
> - `(eval-when-compile
> - (if (boundp ',var)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
> - (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
> - (progn
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
> - (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
> - (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
> - (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> - (progn
> - (defvar ,var)
> - (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
> - (symbol-name ',var))))
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var))))))
> + (if (not (featurep 'xemacs))
> + `(defvar ,var)
> + ;; Not sure if XEmacs's ‘defvar’ works in the same way.
> + `(eval-when-compile
> + (if (boundp ',var)
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
> + (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
> + (progn
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
> + (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
> + (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
> + (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (progn
> + (defvar ,var)
> + (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
> + (symbol-name ',var))))
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var)))))))
> (defmacro cc-bytecomp-defun (fun)
> "Bind the symbol as a function during compilation of the file,
> @@ -377,48 +352,33 @@ definition. That means that this macro will not shut up warnings
> about incorrect number of arguments. It's dangerous to try to replace
> existing functions since the byte compiler might need the definition
> at compile time, e.g. for macros and inline functions."
> - `(eval-when-compile
> - (if (fboundp ',fun)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
> - (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
> - (progn
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
> - (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
> - (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
> - cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
> - (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> - (progn
> - (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
> - (symbol-name ',fun))))
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun))))))
> -
> -(defmacro cc-bytecomp-put (symbol propname value)
> - "Set a property on a symbol during compilation (and evaluation) of
> -the file. Don't use outside `eval-when-compile'."
> - `(eval-when-compile
> - (if (not (assoc (cons ,symbol ,propname) cc-bytecomp-original-properties))
> - (progn
> + (if (fboundp 'declare-function)
> + `(declare-function ,fun nil)
> + `(eval-when-compile
> + (if (fboundp ',fun)
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-put: Saving property %s for %s with value %s"
> - ,propname ,symbol (get ,symbol ,propname))
> - (setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties
> - (cons (cons (cons ,symbol ,propname)
> - (cons ,value (get ,symbol ,propname)))
> - cc-bytecomp-original-properties))))
> - (put ,symbol ,propname ,value)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-put: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
> - ,propname ,symbol ,value)))
> + "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
> + (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
> + (progn
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
> + (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
> + (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
> + cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
> + (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (progn
> + (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
> + (symbol-name ',fun))))
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun)))))))
> (defmacro cc-bytecomp-boundp (symbol)
> "Return non-nil if the given symbol is bound as a variable outside
> the compilation. This is the same as using `boundp' but additionally
> exclude any variables that have been bound during compilation with
> `cc-bytecomp-defvar'."
> - (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (if (and (featurep 'xemacs)
> + (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> (memq (car (cdr symbol)) cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
> nil
> `(boundp ,symbol)))
> @@ -429,7 +389,8 @@ the compilation. This is the same as using `fboundp' but additionally
> exclude any functions that have been bound during compilation with
> `cc-bytecomp-defun'."
> (let (fun-elem)
> - (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (if (and (not (fboundp 'declare-function))
> + (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> (setq fun-elem (assq (car (cdr symbol))
> cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
> (eq (elt fun-elem 2) 'unbound))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2015-09-12 3:36 bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions Stefan Monnier
2015-10-29 13:09 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2019-11-06 1:29 ` Stefan Kangas
2021-05-10 11:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2019-11-06 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Alan Mackenzie, 21466
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Package: Emacs
> Version: 25.0.50
>
>
> CC-mode currently defines various non-CC-mode variables and functions
> with dummy values, as a way to avoid byte-compiler warnings when using
> those external vars/functions.
>
> Since this is dangerous business, CC-mode has to be extra careful to
> undo such settings when they're not needed any more.
>
> It might have made sense back in the days when the byte-compiler did not
> offer built-in ways to silence those warnings, but nowadays we can
> do better.
>
> Any objections to the patch below (which also removes the unused
> cc-bytecomp-put, while we're at it)?
Hi Alan,
This patch was sent to the bug list in 2015, but it seems like it
never got a reply at the time.
Assuming this patch is still relevant, could you please take a look?
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
> 2015-09-12 Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
>
> * lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el: Use newer compiler-silencers.
> (cc-bytecomp-defvar): Use just (defvar <foo>) when that is known to
> silence the byte-compiler warnings.
> (cc-bytecomp-defun): Use just (declare-function <foo>) when that is
> known to silence the byte-compiler warnings.
> (cc-bytecomp-boundp, cc-bytecomp-fboundp): Change accordingly.
> (cc-bytecomp-put): Remove, unused.
> (cc-bytecomp-original-properties): Remove var.
> (cc-bytecomp-setup-environment, cc-bytecomp-restore-environment):
> Don't use cc-bytecomp-original-properties any more.
>
>
> diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
> index 81b7a82..fff2a9e 100644
> --- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
> +++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
> @@ -75,12 +75,10 @@
>
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
> -(defvar cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
>
> (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
> (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
> -(setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
> (setq cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
>
> (defvar cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
> @@ -173,16 +171,6 @@ perhaps a `cc-bytecomp-restore-environment' is forgotten somewhere"))
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Covered function %s" fun))))
> (setq p (cdr p)))
> - (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
> - (while p
> - (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
> - (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
> - (tempdef (car (cdr (car p)))))
> - (put sym prop tempdef)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
> - prop sym tempdef))
> - (setq p (cdr p)))
> (setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set t)
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Done"))))
> @@ -232,22 +220,6 @@ perhaps a `cc-bytecomp-restore-environment' is forgotten somewhere"))
> "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring function %s"
> fun))))
> (setq p (cdr p)))
> - (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
> - (while p
> - (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
> - (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
> - (tempdef (car (cdr (car p))))
> - (origdef (cdr (cdr (car p)))))
> - (if (eq (get sym prop) tempdef)
> - (progn
> - (put sym prop origdef)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Restored property %s for %s to %s"
> - prop sym origdef))
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring property %s for %s"
> - prop sym)))
> - (setq p (cdr p)))
> (setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Done"))))
> @@ -348,25 +320,28 @@ afterwards. Don't use within `eval-when-compile'."
> (eval-when-compile (cc-bytecomp-setup-environment))))
>
> (defmacro cc-bytecomp-defvar (var)
> - "Binds the symbol as a variable during compilation of the file,
> + "Bind the symbol as a variable during compilation of the file,
> to silence the byte compiler. Don't use within `eval-when-compile'."
> - `(eval-when-compile
> - (if (boundp ',var)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
> - (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
> - (progn
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
> - (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
> - (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
> - (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> - (progn
> - (defvar ,var)
> - (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
> - (symbol-name ',var))))
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var))))))
> + (if (not (featurep 'xemacs))
> + `(defvar ,var)
> + ;; Not sure if XEmacs's ‘defvar’ works in the same way.
> + `(eval-when-compile
> + (if (boundp ',var)
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
> + (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
> + (progn
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
> + (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
> + (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
> + (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (progn
> + (defvar ,var)
> + (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
> + (symbol-name ',var))))
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var)))))))
>
> (defmacro cc-bytecomp-defun (fun)
> "Bind the symbol as a function during compilation of the file,
> @@ -377,48 +352,33 @@ definition. That means that this macro will not shut up warnings
> about incorrect number of arguments. It's dangerous to try to replace
> existing functions since the byte compiler might need the definition
> at compile time, e.g. for macros and inline functions."
> - `(eval-when-compile
> - (if (fboundp ',fun)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
> - (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
> - (progn
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
> - (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
> - (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
> - cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
> - (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> - (progn
> - (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
> - (symbol-name ',fun))))
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun))))))
> -
> -(defmacro cc-bytecomp-put (symbol propname value)
> - "Set a property on a symbol during compilation (and evaluation) of
> -the file. Don't use outside `eval-when-compile'."
> - `(eval-when-compile
> - (if (not (assoc (cons ,symbol ,propname) cc-bytecomp-original-properties))
> - (progn
> + (if (fboundp 'declare-function)
> + `(declare-function ,fun nil)
> + `(eval-when-compile
> + (if (fboundp ',fun)
> (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-put: Saving property %s for %s with value %s"
> - ,propname ,symbol (get ,symbol ,propname))
> - (setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties
> - (cons (cons (cons ,symbol ,propname)
> - (cons ,value (get ,symbol ,propname)))
> - cc-bytecomp-original-properties))))
> - (put ,symbol ,propname ,value)
> - (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> - "cc-bytecomp-put: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
> - ,propname ,symbol ,value)))
> + "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
> + (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
> + (progn
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
> + (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
> + (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
> + cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
> + (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (progn
> + (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
> + (symbol-name ',fun))))
> + (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
> + "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun)))))))
>
> (defmacro cc-bytecomp-boundp (symbol)
> "Return non-nil if the given symbol is bound as a variable outside
> the compilation. This is the same as using `boundp' but additionally
> exclude any variables that have been bound during compilation with
> `cc-bytecomp-defvar'."
> - (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (if (and (featurep 'xemacs)
> + (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> (memq (car (cdr symbol)) cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
> nil
> `(boundp ,symbol)))
> @@ -429,7 +389,8 @@ the compilation. This is the same as using `fboundp' but additionally
> exclude any functions that have been bound during compilation with
> `cc-bytecomp-defun'."
> (let (fun-elem)
> - (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> + (if (and (not (fboundp 'declare-function))
> + (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
> (setq fun-elem (assq (car (cdr symbol))
> cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
> (eq (elt fun-elem 2) 'unbound))
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2015-09-12 3:36 bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions Stefan Monnier
2015-10-29 13:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-11-06 1:29 ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2021-05-10 11:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-11 20:34 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] ` <YJrqVlJR4iMvf2s1@ACM>
2 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2021-05-10 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Alan Mackenzie, 21466
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> CC-mode currently defines various non-CC-mode variables and functions
> with dummy values, as a way to avoid byte-compiler warnings when using
> those external vars/functions.
>
> Since this is dangerous business, CC-mode has to be extra careful to
> undo such settings when they're not needed any more.
This was five years ago, but skimming the code, it seems like it's
generally applicable still?
Alan, do you have any comments on this patch?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2021-05-10 11:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2021-05-11 20:34 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] ` <YJrqVlJR4iMvf2s1@ACM>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mackenzie @ 2021-05-11 20:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, 21466
Hello, Lars.
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 13:45:21 +0200, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> > CC-mode currently defines various non-CC-mode variables and functions
> > with dummy values, as a way to avoid byte-compiler warnings when using
> > those external vars/functions.
> > Since this is dangerous business, CC-mode has to be extra careful to
> > undo such settings when they're not needed any more.
> This was five years ago, but skimming the code, it seems like it's
> generally applicable still?
> Alan, do you have any comments on this patch?
I meant to comment on it back then, but the patch is unusually difficult
to follow: most of the context lines are unhelpful in giving the
context, and the git macros identifying the current function in the diff
aren't working here, to a large degree.
There are little things I'm unhappy about with the patch: it explicitly
tests (featurep 'xemacs), which is not done in CC Mode, being regarded
as somewhat vulgar. Instead specific functionalities are always tested
for.
Also, in place of cc-bytecomp-defun is proposed declare-function.
However this is in an inconsistent state, with the documentation
requiring a FILE argument, but Stefan's patch supplying nil.
It seems that cc-bytecomp-defvar has long (?always) been unnecessary,
given that (defvar foo) has ?always had the desired effect, even in
XEmacs. So I don't have anything against clearing out the
cc-bytecomp-defvar's.
So, I don't object on principle to the principle of the patch, just
there are these little irritations about it, and it will need me to
study it more closely to check nothing subtle would get lost (I doubt it
would).
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
> bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
[not found] ` <YJrqVlJR4iMvf2s1@ACM>
@ 2021-05-11 22:03 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-07-23 13:14 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors @ 2021-05-11 22:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Mackenzie; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 21466
> There are little things I'm unhappy about with the patch: it
> explicitly tests (featurep 'xemacs), which is not done in CC Mode,
> being regarded as somewhat vulgar. Instead specific functionalities
> are always tested for.
I use (featurep 'xemacs) because it results in cleaner byte-code because
the compiler replaces it with nil. It also usually results in fewer
spurious warnings (because of the removal of XEmacs-only code).
[ I believe the same holds on XEmacs where (featurep 'xemacs) is
optimized to t, which removes Emacs-only code. ]
But that's just my favorite bikeshed color, it's not crucial for the patch.
> Also, in place of cc-bytecomp-defun is proposed declare-function.
> However this is in an inconsistent state, with the documentation
> requiring a FILE argument, but Stefan's patch supplying nil.
`declare-function` says:
The FILE argument is not used by the byte-compiler, but by the
`check-declare' package, which checks that FILE contains a
definition for FN.
So indeed, a real FILE argument would be preferable, but passing nil
works fine (it will simply prevent `check-declare` from making sure
that file indeed defines that function, which is no different than what
we have now with `cc-bytecomp-defun` which `check-declare` also
ignores).
If you want the "better" option, then it will require changing
`cc-bytecomp-defun` so it takes a FILE arg.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2021-05-11 22:03 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
@ 2021-07-23 13:14 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-23 15:01 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2021-07-23 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Monnier; +Cc: Alan Mackenzie, 21466
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>> Also, in place of cc-bytecomp-defun is proposed declare-function.
>> However this is in an inconsistent state, with the documentation
>> requiring a FILE argument, but Stefan's patch supplying nil.
>
> `declare-function` says:
>
> The FILE argument is not used by the byte-compiler, but by the
> `check-declare' package, which checks that FILE contains a
> definition for FN.
>
> So indeed, a real FILE argument would be preferable, but passing nil
> works fine (it will simply prevent `check-declare` from making sure
> that file indeed defines that function,
I've now amended the doc string to `declare-function on the trunk to
mention this.
Alan, it sounded like you were generally positive to the patch (except
for the `declare-function' bit, which should now be clarified and the
(featurep 'xemacs))?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2021-07-23 13:14 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2021-07-23 15:01 ` Glenn Morris
2021-07-24 10:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2021-07-23 15:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: Alan Mackenzie, Stefan Monnier, 21466
Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
>> So indeed, a real FILE argument would be preferable, but passing nil
>> works fine (it will simply prevent `check-declare` from making sure
>> that file indeed defines that function,
>
> I've now amended the doc string to `declare-function on the trunk to
> mention this.
Whilst that may happen to work as a kludge, it's against the intent of
declare-function, so personally I would prefer that it either remained
undocumented, or you do it properly and make FILE an optional argument
(I haven't checked if check-declare would need changes for that).
Ref: https://lists.gnu.org/r/emacs-devel/2007-11/msg01409.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2021-07-23 15:01 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2021-07-24 10:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2021-07-24 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: Alan Mackenzie, Stefan Monnier, 21466
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> Whilst that may happen to work as a kludge, it's against the intent of
> declare-function, so personally I would prefer that it either remained
> undocumented, or you do it properly and make FILE an optional argument
> (I haven't checked if check-declare would need changes for that).
I almost made it optional at the same time, but then changed my mind --
the nil case is abnormal and it probably almost always an error, so
having an explicit nil parameter seemed a more productive alternative.
But if others feel differently, go ahead and change it.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
[not found] ` <YJrqVlJR4iMvf2s1@ACM>
2021-05-11 22:03 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
@ 2022-03-23 20:13 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-25 21:09 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-26 14:45 ` Alan Mackenzie
1 sibling, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-03-23 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Mackenzie; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, 21466
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> So, I don't object on principle to the principle of the patch, just
> there are these little irritations about it, and it will need me to
> study it more closely to check nothing subtle would get lost (I doubt it
> would).
The patch no longer applied to Emacs 29, so I've respun it.
diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
index 4b8154dafe..277ba29a89 100644
--- a/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/cc-bytecomp.el
@@ -75,12 +75,10 @@
(defvar cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
(defvar cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
-(defvar cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
(defvar cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
(setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables nil)
(setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions nil)
-(setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties nil)
(setq cc-bytecomp-loaded-files nil)
(defvar cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
@@ -177,16 +175,6 @@ cc-bytecomp-setup-environment
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
"cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Covered function %s" fun))))
(setq p (cdr p)))
- (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
- (while p
- (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
- (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
- (tempdef (car (cdr (car p)))))
- (put sym prop tempdef)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
- prop sym tempdef))
- (setq p (cdr p)))
(setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set t)
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
"cc-bytecomp-setup-environment: Done"))))
@@ -236,22 +224,6 @@ cc-bytecomp-restore-environment
"cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring function %s"
fun))))
(setq p (cdr p)))
- (setq p cc-bytecomp-original-properties)
- (while p
- (let ((sym (car (car (car p))))
- (prop (cdr (car (car p))))
- (tempdef (car (cdr (car p))))
- (origdef (cdr (cdr (car p)))))
- (if (eq (get sym prop) tempdef)
- (progn
- (put sym prop origdef)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Restored property %s for %s to %s"
- prop sym origdef))
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Not restoring property %s for %s"
- prop sym)))
- (setq p (cdr p)))
(setq cc-bytecomp-environment-set nil)
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
"cc-bytecomp-restore-environment: Done"))))
@@ -385,23 +357,26 @@ cc-bytecomp-defvar
This can be used to silence the byte compiler. Don't use within
`eval-when-compile'."
(declare (debug nil))
- `(eval-when-compile
- (if (boundp ',var)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
- (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
- (progn
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
- (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
- (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
- (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
- (progn
- (defvar ,var)
- (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
- (symbol-name ',var))))
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var))))))
+ (if (not (featurep 'xemacs))
+ `(defvar ,var)
+ ;; Not sure if XEmacs's `defvar' works in the same way.
+ `(eval-when-compile
+ (if (boundp ',var)
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defvar: %s bound already as variable" ',var)
+ (if (not (memq ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
+ (progn
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',var)
+ (setq cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables
+ (cons ',var cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))))
+ (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (progn
+ (defvar ,var)
+ (set ',var (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-var:"
+ (symbol-name ',var))))
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defvar: Covered variable %s" ',var)))))))
(defmacro cc-bytecomp-defun (fun)
"Bind the symbol FUN as a function during compilation of the file.
@@ -414,42 +389,25 @@ cc-bytecomp-defun
existing functions since the byte compiler might need the definition
at compile time, e.g. for macros and inline functions."
(declare (debug nil))
- `(eval-when-compile
- (if (fboundp ',fun)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
- (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
- (progn
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
- (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
- (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
- cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
- (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
- (progn
- (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
- (symbol-name ',fun))))
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun))))))
-
-(defmacro cc-bytecomp-put (symbol propname value)
- "Set a property on SYMBOL during compilation (and evaluation) of the file.
-Don't use outside `eval-when-compile'."
- (declare (debug t))
- `(eval-when-compile
- (if (not (assoc (cons ,symbol ,propname) cc-bytecomp-original-properties))
- (progn
+ (if (fboundp 'declare-function)
+ `(declare-function ,fun nil)
+ `(eval-when-compile
+ (if (fboundp ',fun)
(cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-put: Saving property %s for %s with value %s"
- ,propname ,symbol (get ,symbol ,propname))
- (setq cc-bytecomp-original-properties
- (cons (cons (cons ,symbol ,propname)
- (cons ,value (get ,symbol ,propname)))
- cc-bytecomp-original-properties))))
- (put ,symbol ,propname ,value)
- (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
- "cc-bytecomp-put: Bound property %s for %s to %s"
- ,propname ,symbol ,value)))
+ "cc-bytecomp-defun: %s bound already as function" ',fun)
+ (if (not (assq ',fun cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
+ (progn
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defun: Saving %s (as unbound)" ',fun)
+ (setq cc-bytecomp-original-functions
+ (cons (list ',fun nil 'unbound)
+ cc-bytecomp-original-functions))))
+ (if (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (progn
+ (fset ',fun (intern (concat "cc-bytecomp-ignore-fun:"
+ (symbol-name ',fun))))
+ (cc-bytecomp-debug-msg
+ "cc-bytecomp-defun: Covered function %s" ',fun)))))))
(defmacro cc-bytecomp-boundp (symbol)
"Return non-nil if SYMBOL is bound as a variable outside the compilation.
@@ -457,7 +415,8 @@ cc-bytecomp-boundp
variables that have been bound during compilation with
`cc-bytecomp-defvar'."
(declare (debug t))
- (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (if (and (featurep 'xemacs)
+ (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
(memq (car (cdr symbol)) cc-bytecomp-unbound-variables))
nil
`(boundp ,symbol)))
@@ -469,7 +428,8 @@ cc-bytecomp-fboundp
`cc-bytecomp-defun'."
(declare (debug t))
(let (fun-elem)
- (if (and (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
+ (if (and (not (fboundp 'declare-function))
+ (cc-bytecomp-is-compiling)
(setq fun-elem (assq (car (cdr symbol))
cc-bytecomp-original-functions))
(eq (elt fun-elem 2) 'unbound))
However, it leads to a number of warnings when compiling, so either my
respin is faulty, or something's changed to make it not work any more?
In c-fontify-recorded-types-and-refs:
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:491:8: Warning: function `c-fontify-recorded-types-and-refs' defined multiple times in this file
ELC progmodes/cc-styles.elc
In c-font-lock-declarators:
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:1063:8: Warning: function `c-font-lock-declarators' defined multiple times in this file
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2300:35: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2300:35: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2496:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2496:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2501:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
In c-font-lock-objc-method:
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2527:8: Warning: function `c-font-lock-objc-method' defined multiple times in this file
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2602:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2602:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2650:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2678:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2678:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2683:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2711:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2711:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2716:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2022-03-25 21:09 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-26 14:45 ` Alan Mackenzie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mackenzie @ 2022-03-25 21:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, 21466
Hello, Lars.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 21:13:35 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> > So, I don't object on principle to the principle of the patch, just
> > there are these little irritations about it, and it will need me to
> > study it more closely to check nothing subtle would get lost (I doubt it
> > would).
> The patch no longer applied to Emacs 29, so I've respun it.
[ .... ]
I'll take a look at it, hopefully over the weekend.
> However, it leads to a number of warnings when compiling, so either my
> respin is faulty, or something's changed to make it not work any more?
> In c-fontify-recorded-types-and-refs:
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:491:8: Warning: function `c-fontify-recorded-types-and-refs' defined multiple times in this file
> ELC progmodes/cc-styles.elc
> In c-font-lock-declarators:
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:1063:8: Warning: function `c-font-lock-declarators' defined multiple times in this file
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2300:35: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2300:35: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2496:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2496:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2501:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
> In c-font-lock-objc-method:
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2527:8: Warning: function `c-font-lock-objc-method' defined multiple times in this file
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2602:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2602:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2650:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2678:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2678:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2683:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2711:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2711:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2716:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-25 21:09 ` Alan Mackenzie
@ 2022-03-26 14:45 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-26 16:47 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mackenzie @ 2022-03-26 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: acm, Stefan Monnier, 21466
Hello again, Lars.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 21:13:35 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> > So, I don't object on principle to the principle of the patch, just
> > there are these little irritations about it, and it will need me to
> > study it more closely to check nothing subtle would get lost (I doubt it
> > would).
> The patch no longer applied to Emacs 29, so I've respun it.
[ .... ]
> However, it leads to a number of warnings when compiling, so either my
> respin is faulty, or something's changed to make it not work any more?
Maybe it didn't work properly back in 2015, I didn't actually get around
to trying it out, then.
> In c-fontify-recorded-types-and-refs:
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:491:8: Warning: function `c-fontify-recorded-types-and-refs' defined multiple times in this file
> ELC progmodes/cc-styles.elc
> In c-font-lock-declarators:
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:1063:8: Warning: function `c-font-lock-declarators' defined multiple times in this file
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2300:35: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2300:35: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2496:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2496:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2501:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
> In c-font-lock-objc-method:
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2527:8: Warning: function `c-font-lock-objc-method' defined multiple times in this file
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2602:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2602:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2650:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2678:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2678:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2683:37: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2711:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2711:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-preprocessor-face-name'
> progmodes/cc-fonts.el:2716:38: Warning: reference to free variable `c-reference-face-name'
The patch is essentially replacing cc-bytecomp-defvar by (defvar foo),
and cc-bytecomp-defun by (declare-function 'foo nil). These are only
approximately similar.
cc-bytecomp-def{var,fun} are like C's extern. They say "this
variable/function will be defined somewhere else".
By contrast, (defvar foo) doesn't really do anything (?except marking
any possible foo as a special variable). (declare-function 'foo nil)
says "This function HAS ALREADY been defined somewhere else (and don't
you dare redefine it!)."
These explain the "free variable" warnings for the variables and the
"defined multiple times" warnings for the functions.
To sort out this bug properly, we really need Lisp functions equivalent
to C's extern. (defvar foo) and (declare-function 'foo nil) currently
don't fill this need.
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2022-03-26 14:45 ` Alan Mackenzie
@ 2022-03-26 16:47 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-26 19:51 ` Alan Mackenzie
0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-03-26 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Mackenzie; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, 21466
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> These explain the "free variable" warnings for the variables and the
> "defined multiple times" warnings for the functions.
>
> To sort out this bug properly, we really need Lisp functions equivalent
> to C's extern. (defvar foo) and (declare-function 'foo nil) currently
> don't fill this need.
I had a brief look at a couple of the warnings (after the patch), and it
looks like the warnings could be resolved by just removing the
cc-bytecomp-deffun (and rearranging the code order).
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2022-03-26 16:47 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2022-03-26 19:51 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-29 12:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-29 21:02 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
0 siblings, 2 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Alan Mackenzie @ 2022-03-26 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, 21466
Hello, Lars.
On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 17:47:24 +0100, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote:
> Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> > These explain the "free variable" warnings for the variables and the
> > "defined multiple times" warnings for the functions.
> > To sort out this bug properly, we really need Lisp functions equivalent
> > to C's extern. (defvar foo) and (declare-function 'foo nil) currently
> > don't fill this need.
> I had a brief look at a couple of the warnings (after the patch), and it
> looks like the warnings could be resolved by just removing the
> cc-bytecomp-deffun (and rearranging the code order).
The whole patch was predicated on:
>>>> It might have made sense back in the days when the
>>>> byte-compiler did not offer built-in ways to silence those
>>>> warnings, but nowadays we can do better.
I'm not convinced that what the byte compiler currently offers is
"better", if that involves having to rearrange things in a source file.
And even then, that would only resolve two of the ~15 warning messages.
By contrast, leaving things alone is not causing any trouble, and seems
unlikely to cause trouble in the near future.
There is currently no clean way of declaring a symbol's variable or
function cell as bound for the byte compiler. Perhaps there should be.
> --
> (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
> bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
--
Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2022-03-26 19:51 ` Alan Mackenzie
@ 2022-03-29 12:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-29 21:02 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-03-29 12:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Mackenzie; +Cc: Stefan Monnier, 21466
Alan Mackenzie <acm@muc.de> writes:
> By contrast, leaving things alone is not causing any trouble, and seems
> unlikely to cause trouble in the near future.
OK, I guess the conclusion here is that we're not going to apply this
patch, so I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions
2022-03-26 19:51 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-29 12:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2022-03-29 21:02 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
1 sibling, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors @ 2022-03-29 21:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Mackenzie; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 21466
> There is currently no clean way of declaring a symbol's variable or
> function cell as bound for the byte compiler.
I think there is: (defvar <foo>) and (declare-function <bar>) is used
for that by all other ELisp packages.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-03-29 21:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-12 3:36 bug#21466: [PATCH] Avoid defining (temporarily) vars and functions Stefan Monnier
2015-10-29 13:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-11-06 1:29 ` Stefan Kangas
2021-05-10 11:45 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-11 20:34 ` Alan Mackenzie
[not found] ` <YJrqVlJR4iMvf2s1@ACM>
2021-05-11 22:03 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
2021-07-23 13:14 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-07-23 15:01 ` Glenn Morris
2021-07-24 10:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-23 20:13 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-25 21:09 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-26 14:45 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-26 16:47 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-26 19:51 ` Alan Mackenzie
2022-03-29 12:26 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-03-29 21:02 ` Stefan Monnier via Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).