* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
@ 2016-09-20 22:48 Glenn Morris
2016-09-20 22:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2016-09-20 22:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 24489
Package: emacs
Severity: minor
Tags: security
Version: 25.1
The (very crufty) Emacs FAQ contains a section:
"Are there any security risks in Emacs?"
The stuff about movemail and synthetic X events is archaic.
There is no mention of the more current problems:
1) installing a package runs arbitrary code
Better make sure you trust whoever gave you that package (gpg signing)
and how you got it (https), etc.
2) using an Emacs mail client to view HTML mail is a security risk if remote
content is fetched (I think it isn't by default, but this might not
apply to every client)
3) viewing remote HTML content (eg with eww or xwidgets) is likewise a
potential security risk.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-20 22:48 bug#24489: efaq: security risks Glenn Morris
@ 2016-09-20 22:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-09-21 21:26 ` Richard Stallman
2020-08-12 1:38 ` Stefan Kangas
2 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2016-09-20 22:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 24489
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> 2) using an Emacs mail client to view HTML mail is a security risk if remote
> content is fetched (I think it isn't by default, but this might not
> apply to every client)
>
> 3) viewing remote HTML content (eg with eww or xwidgets) is likewise a
> potential security risk.
Do you mean privacy risk?
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-20 22:48 bug#24489: efaq: security risks Glenn Morris
2016-09-20 22:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
@ 2016-09-21 21:26 ` Richard Stallman
2016-09-22 10:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2020-08-12 1:38 ` Stefan Kangas
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2016-09-21 21:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 24489
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> 2) using an Emacs mail client to view HTML mail is a security risk if remote
> content is fetched (I think it isn't by default, but this might not
> apply to every client)
Could you explain why you think it is a security risk?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-21 21:26 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2016-09-22 10:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2016-09-23 20:38 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2016-09-22 10:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Stallman; +Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen, 24489
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 17:26:20 -0400 Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
>> 2) using an Emacs mail client to view HTML mail is a security risk if remote
>> content is fetched (I think it isn't by default, but this might not
>> apply to every client)
RS> Could you explain why you think it is a security risk?
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:53:13 +0200 Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org> wrote:
LI> Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
>> 2) using an Emacs mail client to view HTML mail is a security risk if remote
>> content is fetched (I think it isn't by default, but this might not
>> apply to every client)
>>
>> 3) viewing remote HTML content (eg with eww or xwidgets) is likewise a
>> potential security risk.
LI> Do you mean privacy risk?
Images and other resources can carry constructed data and be used as an
execution backdoor through browser or library bugs. The following don't
necessarily apply to Emacs, they are just examples of the variety and
severity of these attacks, which have risen in popularity as direct code
injection has become harder:
http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/05/easily-exploited-bug-exposes-huge-number-of-sites-to-code-execution-attacks/
http://www.pcworld.com/article/2950578/security/microsoft-rushes-out-emergency-security-update-to-fix-critical-windows-flaw.html
http://fortune.com/2016/07/20/apple-security-bug-password-steal-text/
That being said, privacy risks can also become security risks and I think
the FAQ could be extended to include both.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-22 10:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2016-09-23 20:38 ` Richard Stallman
2016-09-24 2:45 ` Ted Zlatanov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2016-09-23 20:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ted Zlatanov; +Cc: larsi, 24489
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Images and other resources can carry constructed data and be used as an
> execution backdoor through browser or library bugs. The following don't
> necessarily apply to Emacs, they are just examples of the variety and
> severity of these attacks, which have risen in popularity as direct code
> injection has become harder:
It is no use telling people, "Be afraid of browsing."
If we can't give any advice more specific than that, it would
be a useless annoyance.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-23 20:38 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2016-09-24 2:45 ` Ted Zlatanov
2016-09-25 17:15 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2016-09-24 2:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Stallman; +Cc: larsi, 24489
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:38:56 -0400 Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> wrote:
RS> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
RS> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
RS> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>> Images and other resources can carry constructed data and be used as an
>> execution backdoor through browser or library bugs. The following don't
>> necessarily apply to Emacs, they are just examples of the variety and
>> severity of these attacks, which have risen in popularity as direct code
>> injection has become harder:
RS> It is no use telling people, "Be afraid of browsing."
The original suggestion by Glenn was to say that remote HTML content is
a potential security risk. That's a statement of fact and I gave
supporting evidence. Those risks apply to Emacs users, but I don't think
anyone proposed "be afraid" to be the message we should give.
RS> If we can't give any advice more specific than that, it would
RS> be a useless annoyance.
Certainly. The FAQ can link to external resources, for instance. I think
in the FAQ we should at least list the libraries that Emacs uses to
render remote content (SVG, XML, PNG, etc.) so the user is aware of
those dependencies and will keep them up to date.
But the method for that depends on the platform, so... do we explain in
the FAQ? Does Emacs itself warn when libraries are out of date? I don't
know.
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-24 2:45 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2016-09-25 17:15 ` Richard Stallman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2016-09-25 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ted Zlatanov; +Cc: larsi, 24489
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> RS> It is no use telling people, "Be afraid of browsing."
> The original suggestion by Glenn was to say that remote HTML content is
> a potential security risk.
Is there a significant difference? I don't see it.
"Browsing" means "looking at remote HTML from web sites".
(Please don't refer to publications or works as "content".
See http://gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.html.)
Certainly. The FAQ can link to external resources, for instance. I think
in the FAQ we should at least list the libraries that Emacs uses to
render remote content (SVG, XML, PNG, etc.) so the user is aware of
those dependencies and will keep them up to date.
This will require updating, and I don't see that it will benefit
anyone. Thus, I think it is better if we don't put this in.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2016-09-20 22:48 bug#24489: efaq: security risks Glenn Morris
2016-09-20 22:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-09-21 21:26 ` Richard Stallman
@ 2020-08-12 1:38 ` Stefan Kangas
2022-01-29 16:51 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2020-08-12 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Glenn Morris; +Cc: 24489
Glenn Morris <rgm@gnu.org> writes:
> The (very crufty) Emacs FAQ contains a section:
>
> "Are there any security risks in Emacs?"
>
> The stuff about movemail and synthetic X events is archaic.
The movemail stuff was removed in 61223a046c (Bug#37818).
What do you think we should do about synthetic X events?
> There is no mention of the more current problems:
>
> 1) installing a package runs arbitrary code
> Better make sure you trust whoever gave you that package (gpg signing)
> and how you got it (https), etc.
This was added in the same commit 61223a046c.
> 2) using an Emacs mail client to view HTML mail is a security risk if remote
> content is fetched (I think it isn't by default, but this might not
> apply to every client)
Is it important to warn about this privacy issue here? I would expect
that any sensible Emacs MUA would disable remote fetching by default,
and document the issues with enabling it.
> 3) viewing remote HTML content (eg with eww or xwidgets) is likewise a
> potential security risk.
True, but isn't this a bit too general to be useful in the context of
the FAQ?
Best regards,
Stefan Kangas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
* bug#24489: efaq: security risks
2020-08-12 1:38 ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2022-01-29 16:51 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2022-01-29 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: Glenn Morris, 24489
Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se> writes:
>> 3) viewing remote HTML content (eg with eww or xwidgets) is likewise a
>> potential security risk.
I've now added a couple of sentences about this.
And I've removed the bit about X -- I doubt it's been relevant the last
few decades (as all X installations comes locked down).
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-29 16:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-09-20 22:48 bug#24489: efaq: security risks Glenn Morris
2016-09-20 22:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2016-09-21 21:26 ` Richard Stallman
2016-09-22 10:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2016-09-23 20:38 ` Richard Stallman
2016-09-24 2:45 ` Ted Zlatanov
2016-09-25 17:15 ` Richard Stallman
2020-08-12 1:38 ` Stefan Kangas
2022-01-29 16:51 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).