* bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again)
@ 2011-11-25 15:16 Drew Adams
2011-11-26 3:59 ` Stefan Monnier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2011-11-25 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 10135
emacs -Q
1. Download hexrgb.el and oneonone.el:
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/hexrgb.el
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/download/oneonone.el
2.runemacs.exe -Q --debug-init -l "hexrgb.el" -l "oneonone.el" -f "1on1-emacs"
3. (setq special-display-regexps '("[ ]?[*][^*]+[*]"))
4. C-h i
5. C-x 5 2
In step 4, a special-display frame is used, correctly (the buffer name
matches `special-display-regexps').
In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same
reason, but it is not.
In GNU Emacs 24.0.91.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600) of 2011-11-21 on MARVIN
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (4.6) --no-opt --cflags
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libXpm-3.5.8/src
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/libpng-dev_1.4.3-1/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/zlib-dev_1.2.5-2/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/giflib-4.1.4-1/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/jpeg-6b-4/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/tiff-3.8.2-1/include
-ID:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/include --ldflags
-LD:/devel/emacs/libs/gnutls-2.10.1/lib'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again)
2011-11-25 15:16 bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Drew Adams
@ 2011-11-26 3:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-26 14:54 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-11-26 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Adams; +Cc: 10135
> 5. C-x 5 2
[...]
> In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same
> reason, but it is not.
I could agree that it's a problem, but IIUC this is not a new issue,
since I think that's how C-x 5 2 has always worked, right?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again)
2011-11-26 3:59 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-11-26 14:54 ` Drew Adams
2011-11-28 15:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2021-09-07 17:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2011-11-26 14:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Stefan Monnier'; +Cc: 10135
> > 5. C-x 5 2
> > In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same
> > reason, but it is not.
>
> I could agree that it's a problem, but IIUC this is not a new issue,
> since I think that's how C-x 5 2 has always worked, right?
You are right, sir - my bad.
Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as a wishlist
item.
Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', a special-display
frame should be used. But you are correct that this bug is very old (at least
as old as Emacs 20).
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again)
2011-11-26 14:54 ` Drew Adams
@ 2011-11-28 15:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-28 16:24 ` Drew Adams
2021-09-07 17:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2011-11-28 15:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Adams; +Cc: 10135
>> > 5. C-x 5 2
>> > In step 5, a special-display frame should also be used, for the same
>> > reason, but it is not.
>> I could agree that it's a problem, but IIUC this is not a new issue,
>> since I think that's how C-x 5 2 has always worked, right?
> You are right, sir - my bad.
Thanks for confirming.
> Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as
> a wishlist item.
The fact that it's not new doesn't change the fact that you dislike
this behavior, so it's not a reason to close the bug.
> Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps',
> a special-display frame should be used.
As you know I use a similar setup to yours so I have gone through
similar thoughts. I haven't actually tried to make C-x 5 2 "obey"
special-display-regexps, but if someone wants to try it, here are some
things to consider:
- The default behavior for special-display-* is to reuse any window that
already displays the buffer, so in order to make C-x 5 2 meaningful
we'd clearly want to skip this part of the usual
special-display-* behavior.
- Maybe C-x 5 2 should be more like "clone frame" instead, i.e. don't
pay attention to special-display-* but instead try to reproduce the
existing frame (including dedicatedness of the window it displays).
This opens the question of what to do when the selected frame has
several windows, of course.
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again)
2011-11-28 15:59 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2011-11-28 16:24 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2011-11-28 16:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Stefan Monnier'; +Cc: 10135
> > Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as
> > a wishlist item.
>
> The fact that it's not new doesn't change the fact that you dislike
> this behavior, so it's not a reason to close the bug.
Thanks.
> > Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps',
> > a special-display frame should be used.
>
> As you know I use a similar setup to yours so I have gone through
> similar thoughts. I haven't actually tried to make C-x 5 2 "obey"
> special-display-regexps, but if someone wants to try it, here are some
> things to consider:
> - The default behavior for special-display-* is to reuse any
> window that already displays the buffer, so in order to make
> C-x 5 2 meaningful we'd clearly want to skip this part of the
> usual special-display-* behavior.
But the only window that already displays the buffer is the _same_ window, and
the purpose of C-x 5 2 is to open a new frame. Seems like the meaning of
special-display would prescribe respecting `special-display-alist' whenever a
special-display buffer is shown in a new frame. I guess I don't understand why
any special treatment of "already displayed" would override that.
> - Maybe C-x 5 2 should be more like "clone frame" instead, i.e. don't
> pay attention to special-display-* but instead try to reproduce the
> existing frame (including dedicatedness of the window it displays).
> This opens the question of what to do when the selected frame has
> several windows, of course.
I would think that the only consideration would be the special-display-ness of
the buffer to be displayed. If it is special-display, and if a new frame is
being created for it, then I would think that that frame should respect
`special-display-alist'. What am I missing?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again)
2011-11-26 14:54 ` Drew Adams
2011-11-28 15:59 ` Stefan Monnier
@ 2021-09-07 17:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2021-09-07 17:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Adams; +Cc: 10135, 'Stefan Monnier'
"Drew Adams" <drew.adams@oracle.com> writes:
> Feel free to close this bug or (IMO better) keep it open, perhaps as a wishlist
> item.
>
> Since the buffer displayed matches `special-display-regexps', a special-display
> frame should be used. But you are correct that this bug is very old (at least
> as old as Emacs 20).
This is adjacent to bug#16767, I guess. But `special-display-regexps'
is deprecated now, so I'm closing this bug report.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-07 17:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-11-25 15:16 bug#10135: 24.0.91; `special-display-regexps' is still not respected (again) Drew Adams
2011-11-26 3:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-26 14:54 ` Drew Adams
2011-11-28 15:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-11-28 16:24 ` Drew Adams
2021-09-07 17:44 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).