unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Mattias Engdegård" <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com>
Cc: 63807@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#63807: bug in compose-gstring-for-terminal?
Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 17:30:25 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83sfbcefpa.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559C2D0F-D71E-433B-AE1A-888EBBD134CD@gmail.com> (message from Mattias Engdegård on Wed, 31 May 2023 15:49:23 +0200)

> From: Mattias Engdegård <mattias.engdegard@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 15:49:23 +0200
> Cc: 63807@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> 31 maj 2023 kl. 15.02 skrev Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>:
> 
> > Setting i to 2 is correct there
> 
> Would you explain why to someone who doesn't know how this is supposed to work?

We basically concoct a glyph-string "by hand":

> 	      ;; Compose by prepending a space.
> 	      (setq gstring (lgstring-insert-glyph gstring i
> 						   (lglyph-copy glyph))
> 		    nglyphs (lgstring-glyph-len gstring))
> 	      (setq glyph (lgstring-glyph gstring i))
> 	      (lglyph-set-char glyph 32)
> 	      (lglyph-set-width glyph 1)

> The main question is whether changing the last assignment to (setq i (+ i 2)) would have unintended consequences. As far as I've been able to determine, testing and inspection say no, it should be completely safe.

If we agree that replacing (+ 2) with (+ i 2) is "completely safe",
then we basically agree that this code runs only when i == zero,
right?  Or did I misunderstand what you were saying?





  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-31 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-05-30 20:36 bug#63807: bug in compose-gstring-for-terminal? Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-31 13:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-31 13:49   ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-31 14:30     ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-05-31 15:08       ` Mattias Engdegård
2023-05-31 16:15         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-31 17:23           ` Mattias Engdegård

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83sfbcefpa.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=63807@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=mattias.engdegard@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).