unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: "Thomas Hühn" <t@2uo.de>
Cc: 58101@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:39:00 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a66ljgwb.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0c5da3e4-f7e1-3894-17eb-93394a0626e0@2uo.de> (message from Thomas Hühn on Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:21:46 +0200)

> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:21:46 +0200
> Cc: 58101@debbugs.gnu.org
> From: Thomas Hühn <t@2uo.de>
> 
> On 27.09.2022 11:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:00:22 +0200
> >> From: Thomas Hühn <t@2uo.de>
> >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> >>
> >> After some googling I found image-scaling-factor, and after setting that
> >> to 1, I always get the expected 1291 . 632 now.
> > 
> > So the issue happens because image-scaling-factor is different from 1?
> > If so, this doesn't seem to be a bug, does it?
> 
> I cannot reproduce the bug today, but the result until yesterday (as 
> written in the bug report) was wrong, even taking image-scaling-factor 
> into account (30 . 30).

Well, we need a reproducible recipe to investigate, I think.





  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27  9:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-26 18:41 bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical Thomas Hühn
2022-09-27  6:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-09-27  9:00   ` Thomas Hühn
2022-09-27  9:19     ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-09-27  9:21       ` Thomas Hühn
2022-09-27  9:39         ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2022-09-27 11:57           ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-27 12:14             ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-09-27 12:25             ` Thomas Hühn
2022-09-27 12:28               ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-27 12:30                 ` Thomas Hühn
2022-09-27 12:36                   ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-27 12:50                     ` Thomas Hühn
2022-09-27 12:51                       ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-27 14:28             ` Stefan Kangas
2022-09-27 15:41               ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-09-27 15:42               ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83a66ljgwb.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=58101@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=t@2uo.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).