From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#58101: 28.2; image-size nonsensical Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 12:39:00 +0300 Message-ID: <83a66ljgwb.fsf@gnu.org> References: <06754647-2195-d85d-1f1b-f75a59985699@2uo.de> <83tu4tjqsh.fsf@gnu.org> <1a31e408-ea01-7e86-d6ac-e45fda14ddb5@2uo.de> <83czbhjhtj.fsf@gnu.org> <0c5da3e4-f7e1-3894-17eb-93394a0626e0@2uo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="36585"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 58101@debbugs.gnu.org To: Thomas =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=BChn?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 27 11:40:20 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1od74c-0009NE-1u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:40:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49766 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od74b-000329-1P for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:40:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41754) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od74L-0002rc-WD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:53805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od74L-0005DW-N2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1od74L-0004S9-J7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:40:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 58101 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 58101-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B58101.166427155817056 (code B ref 58101); Tue, 27 Sep 2022 09:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 58101) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2022 09:39:18 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52883 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1od73e-0004R2-EJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52014) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1od73Z-0004Qg-SU for 58101@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:39:17 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:44254) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od73U-000582-6D; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:39:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=8Yr3ca5XxLSMag4W0Kwxld8qEWNBqrTGAhCaa0MQqko=; b=iVG4CHsC2XHLFitJtGr5 2qz4jKHvZI17JHTlxcN6HASmBeaqg0nnMqrVSCyquXF02cz+QIUEn8XysaHpv9sfbnahdNNQ8yxSy KO3T4AG/qwpccMSVQrq6dfbWAbcstxi7WpCiefA4EF08ekGEYVdSSwg2HYypfwl92CCDmPjHTdbNp gAOzy2xK7i1A0urlYoeQMZ941NJnKDW29OtDNjTCHRFIPZvrXJ+uviWMbwKS4D2gqQD0v46vat0C9 CcVZ/qWHAdrokz11foculYNWvwI8EJk2bK1NMcXnqG+YgEPnqfEMzRNt4OnC1PDzkcmEwdVILRuev NysItx00I97iiw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=1820 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1od73T-0005g0-3h; Tue, 27 Sep 2022 05:39:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <0c5da3e4-f7e1-3894-17eb-93394a0626e0@2uo.de> (message from Thomas =?UTF-8?Q?H=C3=BChn?= on Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:21:46 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:243705 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:21:46 +0200 > Cc: 58101@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Thomas Hühn > > On 27.09.2022 11:19, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 11:00:22 +0200 > >> From: Thomas Hühn > >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii > >> > >> After some googling I found image-scaling-factor, and after setting that > >> to 1, I always get the expected 1291 . 632 now. > > > > So the issue happens because image-scaling-factor is different from 1? > > If so, this doesn't seem to be a bug, does it? > > I cannot reproduce the bug today, but the result until yesterday (as > written in the bug report) was wrong, even taking image-scaling-factor > into account (30 . 30). Well, we need a reproducible recipe to investigate, I think.