From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: sbaugh@janestreet.com, 63469@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#63469: 29.0.90; project.el doesn't add menu-bar entries
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 12:49:48 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a3eed52-3248-74f9-bcaf-bf12660ae0ed@gutov.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83jzx6w2bg.fsf@gnu.org>
On 18/05/2023 10:01, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>> Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 09:53:52 +0300
>> Cc: 63469@debbugs.gnu.org
>> From: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry@gutov.dev>
>>
>> On 17/05/2023 14:30, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>>> From: Spencer Baugh<sbaugh@janestreet.com>
>>>> Cc:63469@debbugs.gnu.org
>>>> Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 13:09:56 -0400
>>>>
>>>> Also with the bug number in the commit message.
>>> Thanks. This LGTM, but what about Juri's suggestion to have a
>>> separate Project menu under Tools, with all these as its items?
>>
>> I think there should be either one or another. Or there will be too much
>> of them.
>
> Why? what's wrong with having both?
I think this will be the only example of menu entries present in several
submenus, won't it?
> these menu items aren't visible unless someone actually drops down
> their parent menu. So they don't seem to be able to cause any
> excessive display clutter.
The same argument could be made that, if you're not using the menu at
all (I don't), then there is no problem.
> The advantage of having both is that these items will be more
> discoverable, and support both discovery through the related
> functionality and through Package itself.
My objection is not a strong one. If people really find it useful to
have both, so be it. But is sounds like an overkill.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-18 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-05-12 17:48 bug#63469: 29.0.90; project.el doesn't add menu-bar entries Spencer Baugh
2023-05-12 19:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-12 19:25 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-15 16:49 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-15 18:15 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-15 18:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-15 18:11 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-15 18:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-15 18:46 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-16 16:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-16 17:09 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-17 11:30 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-17 14:50 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-18 6:53 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-18 7:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-18 9:49 ` Dmitry Gutov [this message]
2023-05-18 10:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-18 14:30 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-18 15:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-18 15:57 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-18 16:06 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-18 19:34 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-19 6:56 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-19 10:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-19 17:46 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-19 18:28 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-22 17:48 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-22 18:20 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-22 19:49 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-22 19:54 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-22 21:20 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-22 21:30 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-23 13:57 ` Michael Albinus
2023-05-24 1:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-24 8:38 ` Michael Albinus
2023-05-23 6:52 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-23 11:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-05-23 18:08 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-24 1:10 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-24 6:25 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-25 1:15 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-25 6:35 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-25 16:17 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-23 6:49 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-22 19:59 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-23 6:46 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-23 18:11 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-24 1:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-24 6:29 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-25 1:14 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-25 6:29 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-25 16:14 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-25 18:41 ` Juri Linkov
2023-05-25 22:19 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-30 17:51 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-02 2:11 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-06-02 6:37 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-03 1:36 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-24 1:00 ` Dmitry Gutov
2023-05-19 14:42 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-05-19 17:41 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-28 0:54 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-28 6:52 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-29 15:30 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-29 17:31 ` Juri Linkov
2023-06-29 18:03 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-29 19:22 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-06-30 5:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-06-30 15:55 ` Spencer Baugh
2023-07-01 9:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a3eed52-3248-74f9-bcaf-bf12660ae0ed@gutov.dev \
--to=dmitry@gutov.dev \
--cc=63469@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=sbaugh@janestreet.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).