From: Martin Pohlack <mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de>
To: Toby Cubitt <toby-dated-1341833729.399c47@dr-qubit.org>
Cc: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>, 11774@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#11774: [O] bug#11774: org-mode causes undo boundaries to be lost
Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 20:33:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FF33AFF.10302@os.inf.tu-dresden.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120625113529.GA15913@c3po.home>
On 25.06.2012 13:35, Toby Cubitt wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:52:41PM +0200, Toby Cubitt wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:39:08PM +0200, Bastien wrote:
>>> Hi Toby,
>>>
>>> Toby Cubitt <tsc25@cantab.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> For some unknown reason, org-mode is causing the undo boundary between
>>>> the (2 . 4) and (1 . 2) entries to be removed from `buffer-undo-list'.
>>>
>>> Can you try again with
>>>
>>> (setq org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo nil)
>>>
>>> and report?
>>
>> Yup, that fixes the problem.
>>
>> I don't fully understand the purpose of
>> `org-self-insert-cluster-for-undo', given that the Emacs command loop
>> already groups consecutive undo entries together, but presumably it
>> enables a more aggressive form of clustering.
Just to clarify this little piece here: I originally introduces this
clustering code to mimic emacs' behavior in text mode. Org-mode's
aggressive interception seemed to prevent that and undoing in org-mode
felt unnatural compared to vanilla text mode. It was never meant to be
*more* aggressive than emacs' original behavior.
The grouping did not happen at the time. The original thread is here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2009-02/msg00691.html
Martin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-03 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-24 21:27 bug#11774: org-mode causes undo boundaries to be lost Toby Cubitt
2012-06-24 21:39 ` Bastien
2012-06-24 21:52 ` Toby Cubitt
2012-06-25 11:35 ` Toby Cubitt
2012-07-02 6:51 ` bug#11774: [O] " Martin Pohlack
2012-07-03 9:57 ` Toby Cubitt
2012-07-03 15:18 ` Martin Pohlack
2012-07-03 17:29 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <jwvpq8coitq.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
2012-07-03 18:13 ` bug#11774: [O] bug#11774: " Samuel Wales
2012-07-03 22:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-07-04 0:18 ` Samuel Wales
2012-07-04 0:24 ` bug#11774: [O] bug#11774: " Samuel Wales
2012-07-04 9:40 ` bug#11774: [O] " Toby Cubitt
2012-07-18 13:21 ` Stefan Monnier
[not found] ` <jwvpq7t1a4t.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
2012-08-01 14:26 ` bug#11774: " Bastien
[not found] ` <CAJcAo8ux9Dw5Nu6x0jm59mWFaLWFG6SSeMs9dju-Jgy5nWkUcA@mail.gmail.com>
2014-11-03 14:35 ` bug#11774: [O] " Stefan Monnier
2012-07-03 18:33 ` Martin Pohlack [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FF33AFF.10302@os.inf.tu-dresden.de \
--to=mp26@os.inf.tu-dresden.de \
--cc=11774@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=bzg@gnu.org \
--cc=toby-dated-1341833729.399c47@dr-qubit.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).