unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
@ 2012-03-14  7:12 Antoine Levitt
  2012-03-14  8:53 ` David De La Harpe Golden
  2020-08-20 19:06 ` Stefan Kangas
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2012-03-14  7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 11011

From a posting on emacs-devel:

Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com>:

> Alright, I thought (kbd "S-TAB") would do the right thing, but
> apparently not. I'm thoroughly confused by emacs keybinding system.

Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org>:

> I think this is a bug in kbd.  It doesn't seem to handle TAB with
> modifiers right.  Please file a bug.






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2012-03-14  7:12 bug#11011: Binding S-TAB Antoine Levitt
@ 2012-03-14  8:53 ` David De La Harpe Golden
  2012-03-14  8:58   ` Antoine Levitt
  2020-08-20 19:06 ` Stefan Kangas
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: David De La Harpe Golden @ 2012-03-14  8:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Antoine Levitt; +Cc: 11011

On 14/03/12 07:12, Antoine Levitt wrote:
>  From a posting on emacs-devel:
>
> Antoine Levitt<antoine.levitt@gmail.com>:
>
>> Alright, I thought (kbd "S-TAB") would do the right thing, but
>> apparently not. I'm thoroughly confused by emacs keybinding system.
>
> Chong Yidong<cyd@gnu.org>:
>
>> I think this is a bug in kbd.  It doesn't seem to handle TAB with
>> modifiers right.  Please file a bug.
>
>
>
>

works for me (tm). what platform are we talking about?






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2012-03-14  8:53 ` David De La Harpe Golden
@ 2012-03-14  8:58   ` Antoine Levitt
  2012-03-14  9:12     ` David De La Harpe Golden
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Antoine Levitt @ 2012-03-14  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David De La Harpe Golden; +Cc: 11011

14/03/12 09:53, David De La Harpe Golden
> On 14/03/12 07:12, Antoine Levitt wrote:
>>  From a posting on emacs-devel:
>>
>> Antoine Levitt<antoine.levitt@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Alright, I thought (kbd "S-TAB") would do the right thing, but
>>> apparently not. I'm thoroughly confused by emacs keybinding system.
>>
>> Chong Yidong<cyd@gnu.org>:
>>
>>> I think this is a bug in kbd.  It doesn't seem to handle TAB with
>>> modifiers right.  Please file a bug.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> works for me (tm). what platform are we talking about?

I'm using Ubuntu 11.10, with gnome/metacity. (on a french keyboard)

Typing S-TAB gives:
<backtab> (translated from <S-iso-lefttab>) is undefined





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2012-03-14  8:58   ` Antoine Levitt
@ 2012-03-14  9:12     ` David De La Harpe Golden
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: David De La Harpe Golden @ 2012-03-14  9:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Antoine Levitt; +Cc: 11011

On 14/03/12 08:58, Antoine Levitt wrote:

>> works for me (tm). what platform are we talking about?
>
> I'm using Ubuntu 11.10, with gnome/metacity. (on a french keyboard)
>
> Typing S-TAB gives:
> <backtab>  (translated from<S-iso-lefttab>) is undefined


I'm just wrong, sorry for the noise - I overconfidently answered without 
rechecking my .emacs, I was actually doing:

(global-set-key (kbd "<backtab>") ...)

probably /because/ the more naive "S-" didn't work.







^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2012-03-14  7:12 bug#11011: Binding S-TAB Antoine Levitt
  2012-03-14  8:53 ` David De La Harpe Golden
@ 2020-08-20 19:06 ` Stefan Kangas
  2020-08-20 19:35   ` Eli Zaretskii
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2020-08-20 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Antoine Levitt; +Cc: 11011

found 11011 28.0.50
tags 11011 + confirmed
thanks

Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com> writes:

>>From a posting on emacs-devel:
>
> Antoine Levitt <antoine.levitt@gmail.com>:
>
>> Alright, I thought (kbd "S-TAB") would do the right thing, but
>> apparently not. I'm thoroughly confused by emacs keybinding system.
>
> Chong Yidong <cyd@gnu.org>:
>
>> I think this is a bug in kbd.  It doesn't seem to handle TAB with
>> modifiers right.  Please file a bug.

I can reproduce this on current master:

0. emacs -Q
1. (global-set-key (kbd "S-TAB") (lambda () (message "FOO")))
2. S-TAB

And see the following error: "<backtab> is undefined"

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2020-08-20 19:06 ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2020-08-20 19:35   ` Eli Zaretskii
  2020-08-20 21:41     ` Stefan Kangas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2020-08-20 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:06:44 -0700
> Cc: 11011@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> 0. emacs -Q
> 1. (global-set-key (kbd "S-TAB") (lambda () (message "FOO")))
> 2. S-TAB
> 
> And see the following error: "<backtab> is undefined"

You say "S-TAB", but that's not the key you pressed.  You pressed
<backtab>, a function key, whereas S-TAB is a shifted ASCII character.
Try "C-S-i" instead (which will also reveal a minor unrelated bug in
your recipe ;-).





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
       [not found]   ` <<83y2m9az4w.fsf@gnu.org>
@ 2020-08-20 20:16     ` Drew Adams
       [not found]     ` <<CADwFkmkGyT_YQBdJ=OVoTr_7piyhDua3+qv5AmTYmeedqFpg-g@mail.gmail.com>
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2020-08-20 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii, Stefan Kangas; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

> > 0. emacs -Q
> > 1. (global-set-key (kbd "S-TAB") (lambda () (message "FOO")))
> > 2. S-TAB
> >
> > And see the following error: "<backtab> is undefined"
> 
> You say "S-TAB", but that's not the key you pressed.  You pressed
> <backtab>, a function key, whereas S-TAB is a shifted ASCII character.
> Try "C-S-i" instead (which will also reveal a minor unrelated bug in
> your recipe ;-).

I was going to say the same thing, or similar.

`TAB` = `C-i`.

`TAB' is not the same as `<tab>'.

(kbd "S-<tab>") => [S-tab]
(kbd "S-TAB")   => [33554441]





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2020-08-20 19:35   ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2020-08-20 21:41     ` Stefan Kangas
  2020-08-21  6:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2020-08-20 21:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
>> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 12:06:44 -0700
>> Cc: 11011@debbugs.gnu.org
>>
>> 0. emacs -Q
>> 1. (global-set-key (kbd "S-TAB") (lambda () (message "FOO")))
>> 2. S-TAB
>>
>> And see the following error: "<backtab> is undefined"
>
> You say "S-TAB", but that's not the key you pressed.  You pressed
> <backtab>, a function key, whereas S-TAB is a shifted ASCII
> character. Try "C-S-i" instead (which will also reveal a minor
> unrelated bug in your recipe ;-).

Hmm, now I see.  This stuff always manages to confuse me.  And I guess
it also managed to confused Chong Yidong...?

Not sure if there's anything to do here, if this is as it should be.
Notabug?

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2020-08-20 21:41     ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2020-08-21  6:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
  2020-08-21  6:55         ` Stefan Kangas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2020-08-21  6:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:41:19 -0700
> Cc: antoine.levitt@gmail.com, 11011@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > You say "S-TAB", but that's not the key you pressed.  You pressed
> > <backtab>, a function key, whereas S-TAB is a shifted ASCII
> > character. Try "C-S-i" instead (which will also reveal a minor
> > unrelated bug in your recipe ;-).
> 
> Hmm, now I see.  This stuff always manages to confuse me.  And I guess
> it also managed to confused Chong Yidong...?
> 
> Not sure if there's anything to do here, if this is as it should be.
> Notabug?

Yes, I think this is just a confusing subtlety of function keys vs
ASCII keys on a modern keyboard.  The OP should have bound <backtab>,
not S-TAB.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2020-08-21  6:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2020-08-21  6:55         ` Stefan Kangas
  2020-08-21  7:12           ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kangas @ 2020-08-21  6:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

tags 11011 notabug
close 11011
thanks

Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> writes:

>> Not sure if there's anything to do here, if this is as it should be.
>> Notabug?
>
> Yes, I think this is just a confusing subtlety of function keys vs
> ASCII keys on a modern keyboard.  The OP should have bound <backtab>,
> not S-TAB.

Thanks, so I'm closing this bug report now.

Best regards,
Stefan Kangas





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
  2020-08-21  6:55         ` Stefan Kangas
@ 2020-08-21  7:12           ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2020-08-21  7:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stefan Kangas; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 23:55:06 -0700
> Cc: antoine.levitt@gmail.com, 11011@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > Yes, I think this is just a confusing subtlety of function keys vs
> > ASCII keys on a modern keyboard.  The OP should have bound <backtab>,
> > not S-TAB.

Btw, binding <S-tab> would have also done TRT in that use case.





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

* bug#11011: Binding S-TAB
       [not found]           ` <<83k0xsbhh8.fsf@gnu.org>
@ 2020-08-21 15:17             ` Drew Adams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2020-08-21 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Eli Zaretskii, Stefan Kangas; +Cc: antoine.levitt, 11011

> Btw, binding <S-tab> would have also done TRT in that use case.

Yes.  IIUC, to be more exact, <backtab> takes care of two cases:
<S-tab> and <S-iso-lefttab>.

To get the effect of <backtab> for Emacs prior to 22 you had to
bind both of those keys ([S-tab] and [S-iso-lefttab]).





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-08-21 15:17 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-03-14  7:12 bug#11011: Binding S-TAB Antoine Levitt
2012-03-14  8:53 ` David De La Harpe Golden
2012-03-14  8:58   ` Antoine Levitt
2012-03-14  9:12     ` David De La Harpe Golden
2020-08-20 19:06 ` Stefan Kangas
2020-08-20 19:35   ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-08-20 21:41     ` Stefan Kangas
2020-08-21  6:10       ` Eli Zaretskii
2020-08-21  6:55         ` Stefan Kangas
2020-08-21  7:12           ` Eli Zaretskii
     [not found] <<87aa3jy7u0.fsf@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <<CADwFkmkUz0ihO8JxPP1pd8uax7347WPEwQ8K0MOv84sKvJkkhw@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]   ` <<83y2m9az4w.fsf@gnu.org>
2020-08-20 20:16     ` Drew Adams
     [not found]     ` <<CADwFkmkGyT_YQBdJ=OVoTr_7piyhDua3+qv5AmTYmeedqFpg-g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]       ` <<83o8n4bkc2.fsf@gnu.org>
     [not found]         ` <<CADwFkm=H51EDt07C0ePRxtdcKyBopaupwremUcRgqD8XVerN+w@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]           ` <<83k0xsbhh8.fsf@gnu.org>
2020-08-21 15:17             ` Drew Adams

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).