unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ken Brown <kbrown@cornell.edu>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: 10257@debbugs.gnu.org, jari.aalto@cante.net
Subject: bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive)
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:53:15 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4EE9611B.7080605@cornell.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4EE95EBB.5040504@cornell.edu>

On 12/14/2011 9:43 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
> On 12/14/2011 12:57 PM, Ken Brown wrote:
>> On 12/14/2011 12:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>>> "Such cases" are those where UID and GID are returned as -1 (I think),
>>> see the original report where Jari shows the result of
>>> file-attributes.
>>
>> OK, I could certainly change check_writable to return success if
>> euidaccess returns failure and UID and GID are both -1. I'll make a
>> patch when I get a chance and let Jari test it.
>
> How does the following patch look?
>
> === modified file 'src/fileio.c'
> --- src/fileio.c 2011-12-05 08:55:25 +0000
> +++ src/fileio.c 2011-12-15 02:17:01 +0000
> @@ -2416,15 +2416,27 @@
> return (st.st_mode & S_IWRITE || S_ISDIR (st.st_mode));
> #else /* not MSDOS */
> #ifdef HAVE_EUIDACCESS
> - return (euidaccess (filename, 2) >= 0);
> -#else
> + int res = (euidaccess (filename, 2) >= 0);
> +#ifdef CYGWIN
> + /* euidaccess may have returned failure because Cygwin couldn't
> + determine the file's UID and GID; if so, we return success. */
> + if (!res)
> + {
> + struct stat st;
> + if (stat (filename, &st) < 0)
> + return 0;
> + res = (st.st_uid == -1 && st.st_gid == -1);
> + }
> +#endif /* CYGWIN */
> + return res;
> +#else /* not HAVE_EUIDACCESS */
> /* Access isn't quite right because it uses the real uid
> and we really want to test with the effective uid.
> But Unix doesn't give us a right way to do it.
> Opening with O_WRONLY could work for an ordinary file,
> but would lose for directories. */
> return (access (filename, 2) >= 0);
> -#endif
> +#endif /* not HAVE_EUIDACCESS */
> #endif /* not MSDOS */
> }

Sorry, this isn't quite right.  I think it's too lenient.  As long as 
I've called stat, I should at least check that stat shows the file to be 
writable, as in the MSDOS port.

I'll send a revised patch.

Ken






  reply	other threads:[~2011-12-15  2:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-12-09 18:23 bug#10257: 23.3.1 Cygwin: network drives - file is write protected (false positive) Jari Aalto
2011-12-09 20:33 ` Ken Brown
2011-12-10  9:58   ` jaalto
2011-12-13 12:18     ` Ken Brown
2011-12-13 14:00       ` jari
2011-12-13 14:43         ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-13 15:12           ` Ken Brown
2011-12-13 19:27             ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-13 20:16               ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14  2:54                 ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-14  3:27                   ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14  8:01                     ` Jari Aalto
2011-12-14  8:35                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-14 12:24                         ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14 12:55                           ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14 13:10                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-14 14:19                               ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14 14:47                                 ` jari
2011-12-14 17:30                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-14 17:57                                   ` Ken Brown
2011-12-15  2:43                                     ` Ken Brown
2011-12-15  2:53                                       ` Ken Brown [this message]
2011-12-15  3:19                                         ` Ken Brown
2011-12-15  4:04                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-15 14:42                                         ` Ken Brown
2011-12-16 19:37                                           ` Ken Brown
2011-12-16 19:46                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-16 23:15                                             ` Stefan Monnier
2011-12-17 17:08                                               ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14 14:15                             ` jari
2011-12-14 14:29                               ` Ken Brown
2011-12-14 14:43                                 ` jari
2011-12-14 17:21                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-14 17:23             ` Richard Stallman
2011-12-13 16:26           ` jari
2011-12-13 16:52             ` Ken Brown
2011-12-13 17:48               ` jari
2011-12-13 17:48             ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-13 18:05               ` jari
2011-12-13 18:36                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2011-12-15 14:44           ` Jason Rumney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4EE9611B.7080605@cornell.edu \
    --to=kbrown@cornell.edu \
    --cc=10257@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=jari.aalto@cante.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).