From: martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@linkov.net>
Cc: 46827@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#46827: Broken initial size of GTK3 frame
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:06:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36799c0d-a26b-a862-2b18-fb9bf9f3f30c@gmx.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871ratp19y.fsf@linkov.net>
>> It's due to to the fact that WM notifications about new frame sizes may
>> be processed earlier or later. I tried to fix that behavior in commit
>> a190b4cfd8b6f42a91678ac7292e1cceccd168e7 by having adjust_frame_size
>> pick up such notifications on the fly and am closing this bug.
>
> Unfortunately, this commit caused a regression: now there is distracting
> blinking of the frame that looks like the visual effect of visible-bell
> when it flashes the frame to represent a bell.
>
> This problem can be reproduced only in Gnus. With such configuration:
>
> (push '("\\`\\*Summary .*\\*\\'" .
> (display-buffer-in-tab
> (tab-name . "*Summary*")))
> display-buffer-alist)
>
> opening a Gnus group in a new tab flashes the whole frame where empty space
> instead of the frame content is visible for a short time.
>
> This problem can't be reproduced with just creating a new tab,
> it only manifests in Gnus, maybe something in gnus-summary-read-group-1
> with gnus-configure-windows forces frame redisplay or something like this.
>
> This problem doesn't exist without recent changes in a190b4cfd8.
Please try to provide some sort of recipe to reproduce this. Ideally
without Gnus because I never used it. Also, I've never seen a frame
"flash". Is that a new frame? Is there anything broken in the frame
after the flash?
martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-29 17:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-28 9:31 bug#46827: Broken initial size of GTK3 frame martin rudalics
2021-02-28 18:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-01 8:32 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 9:46 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 8:31 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 10:15 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-01 12:38 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 13:30 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-01 13:53 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-01 18:03 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 18:23 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-01 18:32 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-01 19:05 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 19:04 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 20:00 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-02 8:24 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 19:49 ` Stephen Berman
2021-03-02 8:24 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-02 9:07 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-02 10:11 ` Robert Pluim
2021-03-02 14:11 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-02 16:07 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-02 16:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-03 8:48 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-03 9:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-03 9:40 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-06 11:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-06 19:28 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-02 9:17 ` Stephen Berman
2021-03-02 10:02 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 18:03 ` martin rudalics
2021-03-01 14:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-03-01 18:04 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-27 8:23 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-29 16:13 ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-29 17:06 ` martin rudalics [this message]
2021-04-29 23:06 ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-30 6:26 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-30 17:12 ` Juri Linkov
2021-04-30 17:37 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-01 20:06 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-02 7:38 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-02 20:46 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-03 7:49 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-03 16:40 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-03 16:51 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-03 17:01 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-03 17:32 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-04 8:07 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-04 21:33 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-05 7:25 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-05 20:34 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-06 7:45 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-07 16:52 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-10 8:23 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-10 20:39 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-11 8:44 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-11 17:49 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-12 8:47 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-12 17:28 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-13 7:54 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-13 16:24 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-14 7:08 ` martin rudalics
2021-05-14 18:10 ` Juri Linkov
2021-05-15 7:56 ` martin rudalics
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36799c0d-a26b-a862-2b18-fb9bf9f3f30c@gmx.at \
--to=rudalics@gmx.at \
--cc=46827@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=juri@linkov.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).