From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin rudalics Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46827: Broken initial size of GTK3 frame Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:06:15 +0200 Message-ID: <36799c0d-a26b-a862-2b18-fb9bf9f3f30c@gmx.at> References: <6caa020a-084c-e3f2-7a34-262f7127b21b@gmx.at> <871ratp19y.fsf@linkov.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21373"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46827@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Apr 29 19:07:35 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA8V-0005TB-AO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:07:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34158 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA8U-0005jv-Cm for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:07:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57794) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA7y-0005iN-NM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:07:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45188) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA7y-0006WU-BA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA7y-0003sz-6c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:07:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: martin rudalics Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46827 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 46827-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46827.161971598914899 (code B ref 46827); Thu, 29 Apr 2021 17:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46827) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Apr 2021 17:06:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56734 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA7R-0003sF-HC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:06:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:36915) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lcA7O-0003s1-Uj for 46827@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 13:06:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=gmx.net; s=badeba3b8450; t=1619715980; bh=FQlsGsQWw8IfS0cpEKNzB3dc4mh7UGl6gnooPe1D3W0=; h=X-UI-Sender-Class:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=XDZYMlaPvKw/DIjD50GZ/800DaE1d7QsVwqph+PV/Vk4ERxMverYq6KKpUwuFMexr QO8zbiUofclvuczplbl5+v+a+h6a9+OoEVVtNFAdrbYISEWJLC/tqFeYBYvgzBqP78 8+vG/RF1yrPZFOVFfjI0sysBXJ+XNg+cDGbiODbI= X-UI-Sender-Class: 01bb95c1-4bf8-414a-932a-4f6e2808ef9c Original-Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([46.125.249.74]) by mail.gmx.net (mrgmx104 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 1N8GMq-1lXXTg0Im8-0148VY; Thu, 29 Apr 2021 19:06:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <871ratp19y.fsf@linkov.net> Content-Language: en-US X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:ZrMTuikv+X9QTg493Oo05zFu3zeKqRmh5203Kd6Aj03bGHw3WsC bG7KLpNBJ3KaZ+rZXTK/gyoHnMr1KV1VltSUf2FsDJTIlxqNTGzUm5nraIRqTiYrixREZ4Q ha+Oq02mWry3a6N61P7d0WvhUlN7d+DswMQDuJvKE/OJajsMX+hw90WDJgJ35k1GAF/lQG9 0QpBlPARxgiNXFN8gTDOg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:vuglPmgDEVs=:2nK3YjKsDX5Ks1OIpfJPTv uIMO+sMHp/cahsVLmhz1B3tPyT913xNV5LCGRZ10eGjMvklVGCzizoYWovy4wOLMkg4xe8Uyv YZR8THLgQ6Dc/9fHHaUnrNvLW0UuvyFEB3OPo3aPMtoSySPGEr9QuXt6T4AZjspqf9sIUYp+J TcLQ8de7P6yjbPMwtHx0TviKax6urdqsSKmpTskLwRqp1c45WeXlEkhFYGaUGmZBcNF8+QQh6 Sr3Db4P9HKSBy1pHfPagZvKJRd2y3s5607VKUew4qdEo4MX5Kk1qglxBkGDMptFlmsrEZKV0V 7TvMlHWQVHr+9RLTZ85KpWkoGw9tMDIGGm1VcIoi4rGbuY6a2+MFq8aVRPOHhxxwti2Bo8PGw eKIYCiSTppvVDM30RhgdcokR24tBGZXeuAS7U3zJlPDvW5SDlzl2LZeqmeF3ST7FhiuJkzo90 B/XhJ4t/I2gFqn0wLx3k5Le43ZvGA+NHc00DsC7aLY9hPfHMRotqaFO5dxuzKNN59NCbbHgh3 XJba256cxP969Z8L7m86Ei+kA7zQceBoF2/GvtSXI+9Z91+KHZdFEX7gfjZnFcn7I4QXEKaD+ bbqwVEr6F5PYJzsGrfAwfcjC9g0glxEiiy+R0xdquqhtaxG3ctgQbEYXEbeB/cqOu1bSE6KCt JBXHjRlw+MK8j2CbZ8WTypPwelGi5gNF0wnfx/MYgOJwPHk74RX3F0g9CRpVY0FMTC7NWV1nY fXtePUM2Bhfo32zgnCOp+huX4TPH0zmLdI4Jx5CzbHcvTyTiTqjMk6VHzyVN4yMNaH4HOTPI X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:205195 Archived-At: >> It's due to to the fact that WM notifications about new frame sizes may >> be processed earlier or later. I tried to fix that behavior in commit >> a190b4cfd8b6f42a91678ac7292e1cceccd168e7 by having adjust_frame_size >> pick up such notifications on the fly and am closing this bug. > > Unfortunately, this commit caused a regression: now there is distracting > blinking of the frame that looks like the visual effect of visible-bell > when it flashes the frame to represent a bell. > > This problem can be reproduced only in Gnus. With such configuration: > > (push '("\\`\\*Summary .*\\*\\'" . > (display-buffer-in-tab > (tab-name . "*Summary*"))) > display-buffer-alist) > > opening a Gnus group in a new tab flashes the whole frame where empty space > instead of the frame content is visible for a short time. > > This problem can't be reproduced with just creating a new tab, > it only manifests in Gnus, maybe something in gnus-summary-read-group-1 > with gnus-configure-windows forces frame redisplay or something like this. > > This problem doesn't exist without recent changes in a190b4cfd8. Please try to provide some sort of recipe to reproduce this. Ideally without Gnus because I never used it. Also, I've never seen a frame "flash". Is that a new frame? Is there anything broken in the frame after the flash? martin