unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Maxime Devos" <maximedevos@telenet.be>,
	"Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Tobias Kortkamp <tobias.kortkamp@gmail.com>, guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Dealing with upstream issues
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 18:25:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ilokeowu.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2dc71c54541e84a647187fb0e6e34672930b697a.camel@telenet.be>

Hi,

On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 at 14:31, Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be> wrote:

> You often close bugs with as rationale: ‘no response since X months,
> hence closing’, so it seems to me that you would simply close bug
> reports if the bug reporter is gone.

[...]

> That's the issue I wanted to highlight -- issues are closed before
> being fixed when the the reporter disappears (and hence, cannot provide
> "more info", or has other things to do than provide a fix by
> theirselves), even if the bug is understood.

These claims are inaccurate.  And it appears to me unfair considering
all the amount of time I personally spend on old bug triage; instead of
doing other (funner?) things.

My workflow dealing with old bugs is: pick one and read the report (and
the complete thread, if any), then,

 1. the report provides enough information for reproducing; I try to
    reproduce myself and report more info, and then I try to collaborate
    for fixing or closing.

 2. the report does not provide enough information to understand what
    the bug is about or to find a way to reproduce; then I ask more info
    – sometimes my reply is even the first one, then,

    a) an answer is back so it is similar as #1.
    
    b) no answer after 2 or more weeks, so I try to determine if the
       report is actionable and if the next action is fine-grained
       enough to be doable.  After 2 or more weeks, I ask again.

       Therefore, if a bug report after 2 or 3 years is not commented,
       especially after 2 or more attempts to understand and ask for the
       next steps without an answer back by the whole community, what
       could be the action other than just close the report.


Ultimately, nothing is perfect and people are doing their best with
their resource at hand; at least, I do my best with the resource at my
hands.  I would be more than happy if more people would try to sort,
classify or fix the old bugs.  Maybe, you will join the effort ?

I stop now the discussion in this thread since I do not see what we are
discussing.

Cheers,
simon


  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28 16:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <6d31ff958ec0c75cbba8324a275315d195a54902.1653045472.git.tobias.kortkamp@gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <87sfntu6ft.fsf@gnu.org>
     [not found]   ` <b6d482002f7773e65e02dbbbf354e1c0178b823a.camel@telenet.be>
2022-06-27 10:10     ` Dealing with upstream issues Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-27 10:30       ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-27 10:37         ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-27 12:32           ` zimoun
2022-06-27 14:20             ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-27 15:06               ` zimoun
2022-06-27 15:41                 ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 11:01         ` zimoun
2022-06-28 12:21           ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 16:21             ` zimoun
2022-06-28 16:47               ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 17:36                 ` zimoun
2022-06-28 20:03                   ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 12:22           ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 12:31           ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-28 16:25             ` zimoun [this message]
2022-06-28 16:47               ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-29  6:07               ` bokr
2022-06-29  7:29                 ` Missing tags in Debbugs? zimoun
2022-06-29 13:45                   ` Bengt Richter
2022-06-30 11:53         ` Dealing with upstream issues Ludovic Courtès
2022-06-27 12:53       ` zimoun
2022-06-27 14:32         ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-27 15:23           ` zimoun
2022-06-27 15:47             ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-27 16:03             ` Maxime Devos
2022-06-27 16:14             ` Maxime Devos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86ilokeowu.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    --cc=tobias.kortkamp@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).