unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Andreas Enge" <andreas@enge.fr>, 宋文武 <iyzsong@envs.net>
Cc: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
	"Christopher Baines" <mail@cbaines.net>,
	guix-devel@gnu.org, 61894@debbugs.gnu.org,
	guix-maintainers@gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#61894: [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 13:22:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <861qm0da4y.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZAcTw6I31Rl3nRDE@jurong>

Hi,

On Tue, 07 Mar 2023 at 11:36, Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> wrote:

> 1) Every current and potential new package is covered by a team.
> 2) Every team has at least 3 members, better yet 4 or 5.
>    3 members would make it possible that even if one of them is on vacation
>    or otherwise busy a patch could be pushed without this additional one
>    week if the other 2 agree.

It would help if being committer implies appearing at least in one team,
no?

Currently in etc/teams.scm.in, I count 26 members and 20 are committers
over the 48 ones.  No blame. :-)

Somehow, we have a bootstrap problem – bootstrap is everywhere. ;-)

From my understanding, Ludo’s proposal is about some structure of how
“teams“ would work and that structure would help in constituting
“teams”.  One way for bootstrapping.

From my understanding, the other approach somehow proposed between the
lines in this thread would be to first constitute “teams” and then
document how they work.  The other way for bootstrapping.

While I am not convinced by Ludo’s patch, I think the approach to
document first how we would like the “teams” would work is better for
bootstrapping them.

Cheers,
simon






  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-01 16:13 [bug#61894] [PATCH RFC] Team approval for patches Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-01 17:15 ` Christopher Baines
2023-03-01 17:59   ` Björn Höfling
2023-03-01 18:17     ` Christopher Baines
2023-03-01 19:21   ` Felix Lechner via Guix-patches via
2023-03-01 22:45   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-02 11:04     ` Andreas Enge
2023-03-02 13:57       ` bug#61894: " bokr
2023-03-03  1:08       ` 宋文武
2023-03-07  1:53     ` [bug#61894] " 宋文武 via Guix-patches via
2023-03-07 10:36       ` bug#61894: " Andreas Enge
2023-03-07 12:22         ` Simon Tournier [this message]
2023-03-07 18:29           ` [bug#61894] " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-07 22:40             ` Leo Famulari
2023-03-08 18:58               ` bug#61894: " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-09  8:48                 ` [bug#61894] " Simon Tournier
2023-03-08  9:12             ` bug#61894: " Efraim Flashner
2023-03-08 17:05               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-08 23:38                 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2023-03-09  5:12                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-09  9:46                 ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-10  4:36                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-10 17:22                     ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-10 18:22                       ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-03-12  2:33                         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-12 11:14                           ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-12  3:26                       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-12 11:52                         ` Andreas Enge
2023-03-13  0:08                           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-12 12:25                         ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-15 16:08                         ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-17 15:46                           ` [bug#61894] " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-10 14:19                   ` bug#61894: " Andreas Enge
2023-03-10 17:33                     ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-10 23:19                       ` Andreas Enge
2023-03-11 13:20                         ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-07 15:21         ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-03-06 15:48 ` [bug#61894] " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-06 21:42   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-06-02 13:50 ` bug#61894: " Ludovic Courtès
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-13 16:30 Peter Polidoro
2023-03-14 15:58 ` Maxim Cournoyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=861qm0da4y.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    --cc=61894@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=andreas@enge.fr \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=guix-maintainers@gnu.org \
    --cc=iyzsong@envs.net \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=mail@cbaines.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).