Re: [patch] ox-latex.el: Add `LATEX_PRE_HEADER' keyword

[Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>]

On 28/09/2023 19:31, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
> I think I should insist on what I said in my previous message, with a
> copy/paste:
> 
> The thing is that here it is not a question of whether something can be
> done in this way or in another better way. This is how a given package
> recommends doing it. If the user wants to use that specific package, she/he
> will have to follow these instructions.

My reading of these instructions: users have 2 options, they either 
provide .xmpdata files directly or they ask LaTeX to generate it using 
filecontents* and take responsibility to remove the file when they 
change metadata.

I do not see any words discouraging the former way, while there are 
warnings concerning pitfalls with the latter approach that still may be 
convenient in some cases.

> It's more. I am thinking, for
> example, of the case in which the user has to obtain a * tex file, not a
> PDF, because she/he is collaborating with more people who do not use
> Org, but do use that code in the * tex document.

Perhaps I am wrong in my assumption that in particular case of PDF-X 
compliant documents, it is unlikely that it is just a single .tex 
document. If there are more files: graphics, custom packages, included 
.tex file then an additional separate .xmpdata file is not an issue.