From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Exporting elisp: and shell: links
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 22:19:06 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uece5a$39p$1@ciao.gmane.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m27conc9a4.fsf@me.com>
On 19/09/2023 07:10, Rudolf Adamkovič wrote:
> Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Do you think a label specifying language should be added to code
>> snippets, e.g. <code title="elisp">(identity "a")</code> or it is
>> useless and may cause undesired noise for screen reader users? What
>> about LaTeX?
>
> As a user, I would expect
>
> [[elisp:(identity "a")]]
>
> to be export-equivalent to
>
> src_elisp[:exports code]{(identity "a")}
>
> across all backends.
(defun org-link-export-eval-link-no-descr
(type path descr backend info)
(unless descr
(let ((element
(org-element-create
'inline-src-block
(list :language type
:value path
:parameters ":exports code :noweb no :eval never"))))
(org-export-data element info))))
(defun org-link-make-export-eval-link-no-descr (type)
(lambda (path descr backend info)
(org-link-export-eval-link-no-descr
type path descr backend info)))
(dolist (type '("elisp" "shell"))
(org-link-set-parameters
type
:export (org-link-make-export-eval-link-no-descr type)))
>> What is your expectation for links having description?
>>
>> [[elisp:(identity "a")][Run it]]
>
> Good point! Perhaps we just need to find a
> good symbol that would work well between the
> Elisp code and the description?
>
> For example
>
> /Run it/ \to src_elisp[:exports code]{(identity "a")}
>
> exports to ASCII as
>
> /Run it/ -> `(identity "a")'
>
> Of course, \to could be something else...
I have another example:
[[elisp:(server-start)][=M-x server-start RET=]]
suitable for a printed document.
From my point of view, it is better either to drop link path completely
or to add a button to copy the code to clipboard. Repetition is undesired.
So I am unsure if it is possible to choose unambiguous rules for export
of elisp and shell links.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-19 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-31 15:25 [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Csepp
2023-09-01 2:44 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-01 9:04 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 10:49 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-01 11:01 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:25 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-02 7:26 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 7:54 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-04 14:58 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-05 11:02 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-06 14:27 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 10:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-07 11:07 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 11:22 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? Jens Lechtenboerger
2023-09-02 7:29 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 18:53 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02 7:45 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 12:00 ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Max Nikulin
2023-09-03 7:53 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 10:51 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-05 9:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-10 4:40 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-17 22:08 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-18 15:20 ` Exporting elisp: and shell: links Max Nikulin
2023-09-19 0:10 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-19 15:19 ` Max Nikulin [this message]
2023-09-21 9:49 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-22 23:43 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-25 14:38 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-26 10:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-28 15:31 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-10-08 9:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-09 12:04 ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-09 12:12 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-10 10:35 ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-12 11:35 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-13 10:20 ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-14 8:13 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-11 19:34 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2024-02-05 15:41 ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Ihor Radchenko
2024-03-12 11:00 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 15:08 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Max Nikulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='uece5a$39p$1@ciao.gmane.io' \
--to=manikulin@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).