Re: Export Org with Org concept -- Re: Problems with C-c C-e file.org,

[Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>]

On 06/01/2023 02:37, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Ihor Radchenko [2023-01-05 14:17]:
>> Could you please elaborate what is bad about the design and maybe
>> provide some ideas how it can be improved?
> 
> There was choice back in time, before 10 years, to provide to user few
> keys to run some functions, like Org export.

Sorry, but your response just repeats complains concerning blocking menu 
that you posted earlier many times. I do not see anything related to 
your original statement:

> After looking into it, into `org-export-registered-backends', I will
> not use it, neither follow the chain of poor design.

Could you, please, concentrate on your vision of proper 
`org-export-registered-backends' design? Personally, I see no major 
issues, the approach is usual for enabling third-party plugins. From my 
point of view, the structure is organized well enough to allow 
alternative implementations of export menu. That is why I am surprised 
that such statement appeared in a topic dedicated to UI.

Do not repeat that blocking menu is not convenient enough sometimes. Say 
what should be used instead of `org-export-registered-backends'.