From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Seb Subject: Re: GFDL with cover texts Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <9592BB6CDB1CEB48826BE86ACD71FA996ABF79@kwik.ic.uva.nl> <98F264E2-8247-431F-896C-0F6945E33016@uva.nl> Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6oP2-000118-GW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:07:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1K6oOz-0000yP-MH for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:07:52 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52225 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1K6oOz-0000yG-FF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:07:49 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:56737 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1K6oOz-0003hf-17 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:07:49 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1K6oOt-0008Id-Mq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:07:43 +0000 Received: from host51.untangle.com ([198.144.196.51]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:07:43 +0000 Received: from seb by host51.untangle.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:07:43 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2008-06-12, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> But anyway, if you're the sole author, you can definitely move to a >> GPL+GFDL dual-license when you so please, but I guess I still need >> to add that IANAL... > > I don't know what this last sentence means. the "I Am Not A Lawyer" part ? Simply that my however strong my opinion is, it does not constitute legal advice :) > ALso, can you point me to an example of the text that I would have > to insert to make you and Debian happy? Adding something like "Alternatively, this program is licensed under the terms of the General Public License [......]", after the existing license, will do the trick. Cheers, --Seb