Re: comment section with latex_header

[Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>]

Hi all,

Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com> writes:
> Robert Klein wrote:
>> On 03/24/2015 10:04 AM, Sebastien Vauban wrote:
>>
>>> Can't we say that a COMMENT'ed subtree is like having all of its
>>> contents commented, line by line?  IOW, nothing "accessible"?
>>
>> This would probably break a lot of babel stuff.
>
> Could you elaborate why?
>
>> If there was an option to disable exports for #+NAME:-ed stuff (i.e.
>> data sources for babel), e.g. somtehing like
>>
>> #+NAME: xyzzy :exports none
>> | munich  | 13 |
>> | cologne | 12 |
>>
>> you could deprecate and eventually disable data sources in COMMENT-ed
>> section.
>
> If you *not to export* some stuff in a subtree, adding the "noexport"
> tag would be enough, right?
>
> Best regards,
>   Seb

FWIW, I agree that COMMENT should be equivalent to individual line # .
Sections that should be accessible without being exported get
the :noexport: tag.

Is there any usecase for COMMENTed sections that is not covered
by :noexport:?

Regards,
Andreas