From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: Re: Citations, continued
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 10:53:51 +0000
Message-ID: <oluiofat4u8.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <87vbjmn6wy.fsf@berkeley.edu>
	<54d04780.cb58460a.5243.2603@mx.google.com>
	<87h9v3li8t.fsf@berkeley.edu>
	<54d078ff.b044440a.06ec.3cf6@mx.google.com>
	<87d25rkmag.fsf@berkeley.edu>
	<54d1bc7b.c57d440a.3c5d.2dca@mx.google.com>
	<87vbjh284z.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87mw4tk4m7.fsf@berkeley.edu>
	<87oap7z664.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87fvaibr3k.fsf@berkeley.edu>
	<87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d25kpxap.fsf@pank.eu>
	<87k2zsso3w.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vbjcoewx.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87bnl4shqg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87h9uwwmgt.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87zj8oqqtz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <m2zj8mpm4c.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
	<87386eywus.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87r3tydswi.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87lhk6xese.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33105)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YL8SE-00010z-Df
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:54:07 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YL8S9-0006Ct-7z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:54:06 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:49299)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YL8S9-0006CU-2I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:54:01 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1YL8S6-0007CG-Cf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:53:58 +0100
Received: from 193.63.223.67 ([193.63.223.67])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:53:58 +0100
Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.223.67 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:53:58 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> So, the (opinionated) useful defaults in biblatex are:
>>     cite(s), parencite(s), footcite(s), texcite(s), fullcite,
>>     footfullcite, nocite
>
> Isn't footcite/footfullcite a choice made at the document's level
> instead of per citation? If that's the case, it could go in a keyword,
> e.g.,
>
>   #+LATEX_CITATION: :style footcite
>

I have only used footcite in beamer presentations so far.  It is quite
common to show a fullframe image and have a footcitation.

But I also mixed them with parencites, when a specicic item on the page
is attributed to a given reference.

Maybe one could debate about using something other that footcite for the
former use case.  So, I don't have too strong an opinion here.

I just wanted to throw in a use-case where this decision was not made on
the per-document level.

Regards,
Andreas