From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Leha Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IEhlcmUgaXMgYSBwYXRjaCBJIHdhbnQgdG8gYWRkIHRvIG9y?= =?UTF-8?B?Zy5lbOKApuKApg==?= Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2015 09:38:07 +0000 Message-ID: References: <54ED4E97.C3CC91.30527@m12-13.163.com> <87d24yb0u1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <54F0118E.D911F7.27458@m12-15.163.com> <87mw3z8z08.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <877fv3rkn8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mq3aq2j.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43720) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjHJ-0005mt-Ch for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:38:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjHE-00059i-DT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:38:13 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34136) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjHE-00059K-6c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 04:38:08 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YSjH8-0006CF-Cy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:38:02 +0100 Received: from 193.63.221.107 ([193.63.221.107]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:38:02 +0100 Received: from andreas.leha by 193.63.221.107 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 03 Mar 2015 10:38:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Nicolas, Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Andreas Leha writes: > >> I spoke a little too soon. I still like it, but there is a regression. >> See http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/95563 > > Indeed. I also fixed a few other things. Here's the update. > > Thanks for the feedback. Thanks for that, which is much better! A small issue I still see is, that without prefix on the headline of a section it claims to work on the section, but does so only if all fragments in the section are overlaid or all are not overlaid. So, in the example below, if only the first formula is overlaid, C-c C-x C-l on the first headline has no effect. I do not mind, actually. But according to the documentation and to the message in the minibuffer it should do something, IMO. Regards, Andreas PS: The example again: #+begin_org * section 1 ** section 1.1 *** section 1.1.1 $\alpha=1$ *** section 1.1.2 $\alpha=2$ ** section 1.2 $\alpha=3$ * section 2 ** section 2.1 $\alpha=4$ ** section 2.2 $\alpha=5$ #+end_org