From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Subject: Re: Efficiency of Org v. LaTeX v. Word
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2015 21:15:53 +0000
Message-ID: <olu387qgsc6.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
References: <m2h9wi6nas.fsf@gmail.com> <m2sifqwab1.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38570)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Y7sWv-0002Kq-NA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:16:10 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Y7sWs-0006Jl-AD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:16:09 -0500
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:46851)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Y7sWs-0006Jd-3P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 16:16:06 -0500
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Y7sWq-0004mv-9g
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:16:04 +0100
Received: from p5b0ef991.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([91.14.249.145])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:16:04 +0100
Received: from andreas.leha by p5b0ef991.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local
	(Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 04 Jan 2015 22:16:04 +0100
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi John,

John Kitchin <johnrkitchin@gmail.com> writes:
> Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com> writes:
>
> Did anyone see the parody of this here:
> http://mjambon.github.io/vim-vs-emacs/
>
> It is pretty funny!

Indeed.  Thanks for sharing.

Regards,
Andreas


>
>> People here might be interested in a publication from [2014-12-19 Fri]
>> available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115069
>>
>> Title: An Efficiency Comparison of Document Preparation Systems Used
>> in Academic Research and Development
>>
>> Summary: Word users are more efficient and have less errors than even
>> experienced LaTeX users.
>>
>> Someone here should repeat experiment and add Org into the mix, perhaps
>> Org -> ODT and/or Org -> LaTeX and see if it helps or hurts. I assume
>> Org would trump LaTeX, but would Org -> ODT or Org -> X -> DOCX (via
>> pandoc) beat straight Word?
>>
>>   -k.
>>
>>
>>