From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) Subject: Re: New %-escape for remember-templates Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:28:55 -0500 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HCDfj-00080c-9b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:30:39 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HCDfi-00080Q-P1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:30:39 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCDfi-00080N-Km for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:30:38 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1HCDfg-0006IX-N8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 06:30:37 -0500 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1HCDeh-00061w-29 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:29:35 +0100 Received: from 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com ([65.35.169.10]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:29:35 +0100 Received: from david by 10-169.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 12:29:35 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org peder@news.klingenberg.no (Peder O. Klingenberg) writes: > david@adboyd.com (J. David Boyd) writes: > >> Because I've noticed that the people that use org-mode tend to keep the >> latest version on hand. The latest is version is 4.63. I was just really >> surprised that you were back so far... > > I don't follow the development of org-mode, so I wasn't aware there > was a new version available until scanned the mailinglist archive just > prior to posting the patch. I'll have a look at the changelog and > consider upgrading when time permits, but round tuits are in short > supply. :) > Oh, I understand completely. To explain more completely, so I don't sound like a jerk (oops, too late), I was thinking, at the time, the people that make patches are the 'cutting edge' people, and _always_ have the latest version. Of course, in retrospect, that can't be true, but that _is_ how I was thinking. Anyway, have a great day, and I look forward to your updated patches... Dave