From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Lundin Subject: Re: Footnotes and org-export, revisited Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2009 10:48:08 -0600 Message-ID: References: <3051994A-5B12-4497-AB58-BAF9A70020D8@uva.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIQiU-0000ZR-UA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:48:14 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LIQiU-0000Yg-6u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:48:14 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38577 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LIQiU-0000YX-2l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:48:14 -0500 Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:33898) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LIQiT-0002Ud-PF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 01 Jan 2009 11:48:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3051994A-5B12-4497-AB58-BAF9A70020D8@uva.nl> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Thu\, 1 Jan 2009 10\:07\:59 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Carsten, First of all, let me say thank you for this wonderful addition to org-mode. I will certainly do more of my writing in org-mode now. Incredible! I've tested the new footnote feature and can get everything to work except anonymous footnotes. When using more than one anonymous footnote, all subsequent anonymous footnotes are exported with the number of the first footnote and their notes are lost. (The same happens when normalizing footnotes in org-mode.) I've included the source and output below. At the moment, I'm using Emacs 22.2.1 (Carbon Emacs). Happy New Year! - Matt ----------- A. Here is the org source: --begin source-- * Testing the new footnotes function Here is a footnote.[fn:: The first anonymous footnote.] And here is another footnote.[fn:: The second anonymous footnote.] And a third anonymous footnote.[fn:: The third anonymous footnote.] Now a footnote with a definition.[fn:label] Here is the footnote with a definition.[fn:special: Inline definition.] Here is a reference to that same footnote.[fn:special] And a traditional numbered footnote.[2] [fn:label] Named footnote. [2] Numbered footnote. --end source-- B. Here's what the exported html looks like (copied from w3m): ---begin exported html--- Table of Contents * 1 Testing the new footnotes function 1 Testing the new footnotes function Here is a footnote.^1 And here is another footnote.^1 And a third anonymous footnote.^1 Now a footnote with a definition.^2 Here is the footnote with a definition.^3 Here is a reference to that same footnote.^3 And a traditional numbered footnote.^4 Footnotes: ^1 The first anonymous footnote. ^2 Named footnote. ^3 Inline definition. ^4 Numbered footnote. ---end exported html--- C. Finally, here are the results when I normalize the footnotes in org-mode: * Testing the new footnotes function Here is a footnote.[1] And here is another footnote.[1] And a third anonymous footnote.[1] Now a footnote with a definition.[2] Here is the footnote with a definition.[3] Here is a reference to that same footnote.[3] And a traditional numbered footnote.[4] * Footnotes [1] The first anonymous footnote. [2] Named footnote. [3] Inline definition. [4] Numbered footnote. Carsten Dominik writes: > Hi, > > the result of this discussion about footnotes is now > in the latest git version, see > > http://orgmode.org/Changes.html#sec-1.1.1 > > for more information. > > - Carsten