From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas S. Dye Subject: Re: ox-tufte-latex Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 15:35:49 -1000 Message-ID: References: <87lh72k57t.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35711) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQmMd-0001ts-LV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:36:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQmMa-0007lI-EM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:36:11 -0500 Received: from gproxy8-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.33.93]:40867) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQmMa-0007l0-7P for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Feb 2016 20:36:08 -0500 In-reply-to: <87lh72k57t.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Aloha Rasmus, You've got it exactly right. I read through ox-latex.el, found the functions I wanted to change, copied them to ox-tufte-latex.el and added a few lines of code here and there (using babel and noweb chunks). It would indeed be easy to modify ox-latex.el so it supports the non-standard commands of the Tufte LaTeX package. I can send patches to that effect, if you like. Ox-latex would need to recognize a few new LaTeX attributes and export marginfigure, marginnote, and sidenote commands. I hijacked footnote for sidenote, so this would probably need some work to recognize when one or the other was needed. The reason I originally decided not to suggest patches to ox-latex.el is that the Tufte LaTeX package is a bit cranky and I was unsure of its future. I thought it might be better to leave ox-latex to the more stable and mature LaTeX packages. I hadn't thought about backporting, etc. hth, Tom Rasmus writes: > Mojn Tom, > > I'm pretty invested in KOMA-Script but this is a great as a lot of > people really appreciate the Tufte package. > > Thomas S. Dye writes: > >> I've cobbled together an exporter for the Tufte LaTeX classes, >> which I'd like to contribute to Org mode contrib/. > > My initial beef with your code it that it seems, from skimming the > code, to replicate a lot of functions from ox-latex. This means > that when ox-latex.el updates, we might have to backport the > changes into ox-tufte-latex. It’s already some work keeping > ox-beamer and ox-latex up to date (e.g. I added a some feature to > ox-latex and only realized much later that I hadn’t added it to > ox-beamer). > > E.g. org-tufte-latex--inline-image is very much alike > org-latex--inline-image. > > I don’t know to what extend it would be possible to minimize > replication. Perhaps you already did this and perhaps my comments > are merely following from the fact that I did not study your patch > appropriately (I’m traveling ATM). > > Another question is, what features would we need to make more > flexible in ox-latex in order to obsolete your class or reduce it > to an element in org-latex-classes? Is there some areas where > it’s lacking for the purpose of "tufing" ox-latex output? > > In any I’m very happy that you are working on this. I hope the > above is not discouraging; that’s at least not what it’s meant to > be. > > Thanks, > Rasmus -- Thomas S. Dye http://www.tsdye.com