From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Subject: Re: Citation syntax: a revised proposal
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:21:45 -0500
Message-ID: <m2mw4dogxy.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
References: <87k2zjnc0e.fsf@berkeley.edu> <m2k2ziq4rb.fsf@andrew.cmu.edu>
	<87bnktrfrx.fsf@berkeley.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60889)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>) id 1YNQIq-00074I-2m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:21:53 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>) id 1YNQIn-0002es-4P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:21:52 -0500
Received: from smtp.andrew.cmu.edu ([128.2.157.39]:52101)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>) id 1YNQIm-0002ec-Vp
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2015 13:21:49 -0500
In-reply-to: <87bnktrfrx.fsf@berkeley.edu>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Richard Lawrence <richard.lawrence@berkeley.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


>
>> There is no question in my mind that some people will want to extend
>> this, as there are just too few of the latex citation commands
>> supported out of the box, especially for biblatex users (who used that
>> because of limitations in bibtex ;).
>
> Do you think there are important commands that I missed?  I did try to
> make sure that all the major distinctions in biblatex were covered,
> though I ignored some more esoteric things like smartcite and volcite.

I think the most common ones are there. It is just that over a decade in
academia has taught me that there are always people that do things
another way, for some reason, including to be difficult ;)


> So I suggest we let a thousand flowers bloom, and see what people come
> up with, rather than trying to cut down on the verbosity up front.

Also fine with me.


> Hmm, OK.  Let's discuss this in another thread.
>
>> So, overall, I am on the positive side of zero.
>
> Haha, leave it to a physical scientist to turn a discrete interval into
> a continuous one... ;)

Indeed! I could have gone with

+i

for I imagine it might work ;)

>
> Best,
> Richard

--
Professor John Kitchin
Doherty Hall A207F
Department of Chemical Engineering
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh, PA 15213
412-268-7803
@johnkitchin
http://kitchingroup.cheme.cmu.edu