From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Moe Subject: Re: [POLL] Do you need special entities in radio target? Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:31:26 +0100 Message-ID: References: <878us3mdvr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44994) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRIGd-000485-FL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:31:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRIGV-0005at-4h for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:31:03 -0400 Received: from mail-forward2.uio.no ([2001:700:100:10::71]:49476) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WRIGU-00055g-U8 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 05:30:55 -0400 Received: from exim by mail-out2.uio.no with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.75) (envelope-from ) id 1WRIFh-0004RY-VT for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Mar 2014 10:30:05 +0100 In-reply-to: <878us3mdvr.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Bastien Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Excluding special entities would not interfere with anything I've done with radio targets so far. I can imagine future uses, but probably nothing I couldn't work around with Unicode. But is this only about special entities, or about all Org syntax, including subscripts/superscripts, emphasis...? That would be limiting. As long as radio targets are visible parts of the text, I'd like them to continue supporting such markup. Yours, Christian Bastien writes: > Hi all, > > the subject says it all -- see this thread for reference: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/83648 > > Would you be okay if radio targets like <<>> > are limited to plain text? > > Thanks for your feedback,