From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Cowley Subject: Re: [PATCH] org-latex-compile timestamp checks Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:48:47 -0500 Message-ID: References: <57F8EBE2-E535-423A-828B-BCB3A2B9F797@gmail.com> <87r3hjf3b9.fsf@gmx.us> <87vb6tblkr.fsf@gmx.us> <87k2n3jlzk.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u3jdj3m.fsf@gmx.us> <87fuxkhttk.fsf@gmx.us> <878u3crnjc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <878u3chtbs.fsf@gmx.us> <87powm2hx1.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <874mdydnfb.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52427) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOooZ-0004sd-6o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:48:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOooW-0008H3-0W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:48:55 -0500 Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]:36122) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aOooV-0008Ge-Rz for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 10:48:51 -0500 Received: by mail-qg0-x232.google.com with SMTP id e32so42270089qgf.3 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:48:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from Sonmi451.home (pool-72-82-169-143.cmdnnj.east.verizon.net. [72.82.169.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s130sm4729473qhb.6.2016.01.28.07.48.49 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 07:48:49 -0800 (PST) In-reply-to: <874mdydnfb.fsf@gmx.us> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> Thanks! I have added a TODO to my agenda regarding checking other >>> backends, but I'd not hold grudges against anyone who beats me to it. >> >> I took care of ox-groff, ox-man and ox-texinfo. > > Thanks. > >> I let you improve zip handling in ox-odt, if you want to. > > OK. I'll be traveling this weekend so I won't have time then. Though it > should be quick now that I can look at yours and Anthony’s code. > > Rasmus Thank you both for following up on this! I had grep'ed the tree for other time comparisons and not seen any, but didn't read closely enough to see the reliance on file existence checks in the other back-ends. Anthony