From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by ms11 with LMTPS
	id mCV8IIzl5F5ePwAA0tVLHw
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:41:16 +0000
Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::])
	(using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	by mp1 with LMTPS
	id AMYxHIzl5F4GMQAAbx9fmQ
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:41:16 +0000
Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 984349404CB
	for <larch@yhetil.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:41:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([::1]:60292 helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1jk7LO-0000Wk-8O
	for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:41:14 -0400
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59416)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <stig@brautaset.org>)
 id 1jk7Ko-0000WE-E7
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:40:38 -0400
Received: from relay10.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.230]:43359)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <stig@brautaset.org>)
 id 1jk7Km-0002VS-8m
 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:40:37 -0400
Received: from localhost (82-69-109-251.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk [82.69.109.251])
 (Authenticated sender: stig@brautaset.org)
 by relay10.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7015C240005
 for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 13 Jun 2020 14:40:30 +0000 (UTC)
From: Stig Brautaset <stig@brautaset.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: tags-todo org-agenda-custom-command weirdness
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2020 15:40:26 +0100
Message-ID: <m2ftazm3l1.fsf@brautaset.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.230; envelope-from=stig@brautaset.org;
 helo=relay10.mail.gandi.net
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/13 10:40:32
X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS   = Linux 3.11 and newer
X-Spam_score_int: -35
X-Spam_score: -3.6
X-Spam_bar: ---
X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
 SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
 <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" <emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org>
X-Scanner: scn0
Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com;
	dkim=none;
	dmarc=none;
	spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org
X-Spam-Score: -1.01
X-TUID: 41nfRyTCSEXG


Hi,

I'm seeing some weirdness with tags-todo vs tags custom agenda commands.
Below is the smallest case I've managed to narrow it down to. I would
*expect* that all the a1-4 commands return the same results, and that
the b1-4 return the same results. That is not what I'm seeing, however.

(setq-default org-agenda-custom-commands
	      '(("a1" "A1" tags-todo "-PROJ/TODO")
                ("a2" "A2" tags "-PROJ/TODO")
		("a3" "A3" ((tags-todo "-PROJ/TODO")))
		("a4" "A4" ((tags "-PROJ/TODO")))
		
		("b1" "B1" tags-todo "-PROJ/DONE")
		("b2" "B2" tags "-PROJ/DONE")
		("b3" "B3" ((tags-todo "-PROJ/DONE")))
		("b4" "B4" ((tags "-PROJ/DONE")))))


The effect of a1 & a2 appears identical to eachother, and a3 & a4 too,
but a1-2 and a3-4 differ (in that the former seems to include scheduled
items, but the latter does not.)

What I'm seeing for b1-4 is even weirder. Here I observe b1, b2 and b4
have identical behaviour[*], but b3 is the odd one out: while the other
three return a list of DONE non-project tasks, b3 doesn't find anything.

[*] I suspect the reason b2 and b4 are identical is that I have no
scheduled DONE tasks.

I also see this with =m= vs =M= in the org-agenda menu. I see it even
when starting emacs with -q, so it appears to not be some spectactular
breakage on my part. Is anyone else seing this?


Stig