From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Wiegley Subject: Re: Feature request: Selective encryption Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:14:59 -0400 Message-ID: References: <200709020820.l828KgGD005350@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRvrC-0007Wd-KQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:15:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IRvrA-0007VM-3l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:15:42 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IRvr9-0007VH-U1 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:15:39 -0400 Received: from fyodor.hcoop.net ([64.20.38.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IRvr9-0000qz-HA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:15:39 -0400 Received: from [72.22.155.27] (helo=Hermes.local) by fyodor.hcoop.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1IRvsQ-0001pG-3D for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 02 Sep 2007 16:16:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200709020820.l828KgGD005350@localhost.localdomain> (Xavier Maillard's message of "Sun\, 2 Sep 2007 10\:20\:42 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Xavier Maillard writes: > [congratulations for your paper on your org usage, this is wonderful] Thanks. :) > allout.el goes a long way toward providing all of the above, I just > wasn't fond of the mechanism (I tried porting it straight to org-mode one > day, then stopped). For one thing, I want to use my GnuPG public key for > encryption, not a symmetric cipher. That needs to be configurable. > > I do not see how you would use multiple keys/password per file > with only your GNUpg key. Did I miss something here ? I do have multiple keys -- one for work, one for personal, for example. John