From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Subject: Re: export_file_name problem with new exporter
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 08:21:46 +0100
Message-ID: <m27god9oj9.fsf@top-wifi.irisa.fr>
References: <m2sj7icg2r.fsf@top.irisa.fr>, <8738zadrpn.fsf@gmail.com>,
	<m2vcc65aes.fsf@polytechnique.org>, <87y5h2cbao.fsf@gmail.com>,
	<m2txrq59sb.fsf@polytechnique.org>, <87sj7agc5p.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33154)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1TlaRz-00034X-9v
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:22:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1TlaRy-0000xM-9P
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:21:51 -0500
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.82]:57641)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>) id 1TlaRy-0000xA-39
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2012 02:21:50 -0500
In-reply-to: <87sj7agc5p.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Nicolas Goaziou writes:

>> By "validating", do you mean that I have received them back signed from
>> the FSF? (I signed and sent them a few weeks ago, still waiting to get
>> them back ...)
>
> Yes. We have to wait for confirmation from the FSF. It shouldn't be too
> long now.

I have received the confirmation from the FSF (the scanned papers with
their signature).

I'll commit as soon as I can find the magic git incantations to get rid
of the "merge" commits that happened as I was pulling changes from the
repository.

Alan