From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ken Mankoff <mankoff@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Org + MS DOC
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:44:38 -0500
Message-ID: <m27fiknoah.fsf@client-130-203-90-149.mobility.psu.edu>
References: <m28u30nxgl.fsf@client-130-203-90-149.mobility.psu.edu>
	<xgzpowcmahh.fsf@hafro.is>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43540)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mankoff@gmail.com>) id 1aRRhm-0001XH-IK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:44:47 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mankoff@gmail.com>) id 1aRRhi-0003xR-Em
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:44:46 -0500
Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]:36810)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mankoff@gmail.com>) id 1aRRhi-0003xK-Ad
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 16:44:42 -0500
Received: by mail-qg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id y9so48819519qgd.3
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 04 Feb 2016 13:44:42 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <xgzpowcmahh.fsf@hafro.is>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Julian M. Burgos" <julian@hafro.is>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On 2016-02-04 at 16:28, Julian M. Burgos <julian@hafro.is> wrote:
> The advantage of exporting via Pandoc is the possibility of including
> bibliographic citations. Do you know if it is possible to do this via
> ODT?

I think ODT can do it w/ extra work (JabRef?) but my method does not. Yes pandoc does support that. The final product appears improved enough via this new method that I think I'll cut-and-paste the reference list from PDF.

  -k.